Franklin Richards
Avenger
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2002
- Messages
- 22,983
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Which member of the GOP will apologize to him?




I am all for green technology. I am not all for the government creating those jobs under their payroll and why anyone would think the government trying to develop new technology will be fruitful makes me laugh.You seem to ignore most of the businesses in NAT GAS, E-15, hydrogen cells, electric vehicles, etc. want government investment. You are obviously ignoring that many industries are frustrated there is no Renewable Energy Standard in this country as it leaves the future uncertain and are looking at other things.
And most of all you seem to forget we're on a timetable here. Green technology is the future because oil is going to become very, very expensive over the next 50 years when our global population nearly doubles. And if you look at the lack of glaciers in Glacier National Park or the polar bears drowning this summer...there are more than just energy issues at hand.
But, sticking the head in the sand is the go-to strategy these days.
So government should force innovation on companies? It is fine if they provide incentives, but that isn't the government creating green jobs...which is what Obama was wanting. He wanted to create government green jobs in the short term to help lower unemployment numbers. He wanted government green jobs.
On noes, Thomas Friedman surfs SHHCap and Trade is an incentive (a stick). I thought that was your big hang-up? "Government green jobs?" He's trying to spur growth by putting more money into battery and Natural Gas vehicles to try and make them more affordable, to bring the costs down. He also is trying to push the government to buying and upgrading their buildings to greener standards. As the federal government is 38 percent of the GDP, that creates some nice incentives to try to get the private market to appeal to that.
These are private jobs (contractors or researchers right now) being created. Carbon pricing makes carbon more expensive thus incentivizes energy companies and utilities to look at other means to not use carbon and as a byproduct reducing our national consumption of oil and also carbon emissions. That is what I thought you were obsessed about.
That is not the government creating jobs. It is making (oil and gas) energy more expensive to speed-up the process of reducing our overall dependency as energy industries are reluctant to change as of all the money in oil. But that is not what you describe.
On noes, Thomas Friedman surfs SHH![]()
BP Takes $32.2 Billion Write-Off on Spill; Earns $9.9 Billion Tax Credit
Half of BP's Escrow account will be paid by the taxpayers.
Awesome![]()
If they take it, it may mean quicker pay out to the people of the Gulf that need it....just saying...
Good news is that it sounds like Bay County on East is looking to avoid major oil damage.
Bad news is that it means termination of thousands of employees - myself included. I'm trying to get up with a contractor in Lousiana or Texas now.
If I get a job in Michigan maybe I can buy you a beer in Ohio![]()