🇺🇸 Discussion: Guns, The Second Amendment, NRA - Part II

US News
Okay.

"No sitting Republicans who were in Congress in 2001 voted against the PATRIOT Act."

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/06/congress-government-spying-votes-charts/314519/

80% of Republicans supported extending the PATRIOT Act in 2005.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/PollVault/story?id=833703

It's only when Obama became president that support for the PATRIOT Act fell to 52% among Republicans

http://blogs.marketwatch.com/capito...republicans-switch-views-on-nsa-surveillance/

They also voted for Trump.

The receipts are real.
 
I'm more likely to get shot by an idiot with a gun than a terrorist or the government. This whole "I need my AR-15 to stop government tyranny" is childish, unrealistic, and poorly thought out.

Maybe if you had a cache of flintlocks in 1790, I might buy this logic. But it's 2018. You're not going to stop government tyranny with a gun. And to make that point even more moot, your track record shows you'd probably support the demagogue. In the meantime people are getting shot left and right.

This is like Sean Hannity's fantasy that he's going to take out the Las Vegas shooter on the 32nd floor with a handgun.
 
Okay.

"No sitting Republicans who were in Congress in 2001 voted against the PATRIOT Act."

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/06/congress-government-spying-votes-charts/314519/

80% of Republicans supported extending the PATRIOT Act in 2005.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/PollVault/story?id=833703

It's only when Obama became president that support for the PATRIOT Act fell to 52% among Republicans

http://blogs.marketwatch.com/capito...republicans-switch-views-on-nsa-surveillance/

They also voted for Trump.

Ok, so now the Democrats are for the Patriot Act and against the 2A while the Republicans are the opposite. I thought you said 2A supporters loved the Patriot Act.
 
Ok, so now the Democrats are for the Patriot Act and against the 2A while the Republicans are the opposite. I thought you said 2A supporters loved the Patriot Act.

They did when it was at its strongest.

Their hatred for Obama did change the numbers, but I believe there is still a slim plurality.
 
I was going through an old Photobucket account and came across this gem. It's close to 10 years old from a local shop near me. Now, tell me people selling guns don't exploit the fears of gun nuts?

100_2859.jpg

Democrats are the ones instilling fear with the assault weapons ban, Gun Confiscation ballot measures, and redefining "assault weapons" as ALL semi-automatic rifles. I can see through your lies.
 
Last edited:
Mike, bruh bruh, you think if the American military decides to enforce a presumably unlawful order to enslave/mass imprison/mass murder the American people that a bunch of people armed to the teeth with what they can buy at gun shows/stores is going to stop them?

What's your home defense AR-15 going to do against a drone strike from several miles away?

This is not how these things work. Governments typically become tyrannical AFTER they ban guns. It's a lot easier to control an unnamed population. Give up our guns and we'll be just like the U.K.- Cutting sreaks with butter knives, getting arrested over social media posts, and courts deciding if your infant son is deemed fit to live or not.
 
I'm more likely to get shot by an idiot with a gun than a terrorist or the government. This whole "I need my AR-15 to stop government tyranny" is childish, unrealistic, and poorly thought out.

Maybe if you had a cache of flintlocks in 1790, I might buy this logic. But it's 2018. You're not going to stop government tyranny with a gun. And to make that point even more moot, your track record shows you'd probably support the demagogue. In the meantime people are getting shot left and right.

This is like Sean Hannity's fantasy that he's going to take out the Las Vegas shooter on the 32nd floor with a handgun.

Cliven Bundy managed to fend off BLM back in 2014. The track record of citizens giving up their guns is not good. Just ask the Jews.

Also, you don't know anything about me or my track record, so piss off!
 
This is not how these things work. Governments typically become tyrannical AFTER they ban guns. It's a lot easier to control an unnamed population. Give up our guns and we'll be just like the U.K.- Cutting sreaks with butter knives, getting arrested over social media posts, and courts deciding if your infant son is deemed fit to live or not.

Yeah that's kind of BS.

Look if you want a gun to defend your house, that's fine. I can actually buy that argument. But this notion that guns safeguard democracy is just stupid.

The government just turns the gun owning people on a hated minority. The Nazis actually loosened gun laws for most Germans. Just not Jews, obviously.

Also nice job tying in all those topics.

We can not have weekly school shootings and not turn into the UK you know. This isn't 1776.
 
Last edited:
Cliven Bundy managed to fend off BLM back in 2014. The track record of citizens giving up their guns is not good. Just ask the Jews.

Also, you don't know anything about me or my track record, so piss off!

The racist guy who doesn't want to pay taxes?

Also You seem right wing as **** dude. What am I missing?
 
Last edited:
Yeah that's kind of BS.

Look if you want a gun to defend your house, that's fine. I can actually buy that argument. But this notion that guns safeguard democracy is just stupid.

The government just turns the gun owning people on a hated minority. The Nazis actually loosened gun laws for most Germans. Just not Jews, obviously.

Also nice job tying in all those topics.

We can not have weekly school shootings and not turn into the UK you know. This isn't 1776.

Weakening the Second Amendment probably would lead to weakening the First Amendment. Already there's a lot of angst and anger over social media speech and insistence that it be more regulated if not even deserving of punishment.
 
Democrats are the ones instilling fear with the assault weapons ban, Gun Confiscation ballot measures, and redefining "assault weapons" as ALL semi-automatic rifles. I can see through your lies.

So, you're saying that the guy who put this ad in the paper is a Democrat? I'd bet my paycheck, he's not. My point was, the guy who put out this ad, during Obama's 1st term, was playing on the fears of gun nuts that Obama was going to ban guns. Republicans preached that Obama was going to come for the guns and retailers like this one, latched onto that and used it to sell more guns.
 
Democrats are the ones instilling fear with the assault weapons ban, Gun Confiscation ballot measures, and redefining "assault weapons" as ALL semi-automatic rifles. I can see through your lies.

You called someone else a liar that even if you disagree with their conclusions had a logical POV based of the public record and the experience all adults of a certain age had from the period referenced.

You then start trafficking in stupid conspiracy theories and suspect your fellow citizens of being part of a mass movement (which NEVER materializes) to forcibly disarm Americans.

There is way more evidence to call a person that spouts off that heated rhetoric a credulous wacko fool than to label Hotwire a liar.
 
Cliven Bundy managed to fend off BLM back in 2014. The track record of citizens giving up their guns is not good. Just ask the Jews.

Also, you don't know anything about me or my track record, so piss off!

No they didn't. They didn't hold off jack ****. They were handled with kid gloves because the law enforcement on the scene didn't want to massacre a bunch of dumb hick goons, period. Try a stunt like that in say, Putin's Russia and a military style assault would have been the result and those that initiated the stand off would have been decimated by better armed and trained personnel.


Buddy and his group didn't stop **** with their guns. They were shown mercy.

And I would like to add that in my view had they been anything other than a bunch of white farmers the standoff would probably had a violent end. Or in other words... Bundy and his gang of idiots were the beneficiaries of "political correctness". In this case the government and law enforcement did their best to avoid casualties where in another set of circumstances they would likely not shown such a soft touch.


Steal some cigs from a convenience store and run from the police while being brown skinned? Get shot. Collect a group folk, arm them, have them point weapons at law enforcement and threaten violence if your demands aren't met while occupying government property after years of not paying legal fees that are due use of public lands? Hey now... Let's not let this escalate anymore. Let's hear them out.

Gimme a break with these inept mental gymnastics.
 
You called someone else a liar that even if you disagree with their conclusions had a logical POV based of the public record and the experience all adults of a certain age had from the period referenced.

You then start trafficking in stupid conspiracy theories and suspect your fellow citizens of being part of a mass movement (which NEVER materializes) to forcibly disarm Americans.

There is way more evidence to call a person that spouts off that heated rhetoric a credulous wacko fool than to label Hotwire a liar.
Thank you.
 
My sincere sympathies for the wounded, and the families of the victims in today's mass shooting in Maryland.

This is America.
 
My sincere sympathies for the wounded, and the families of the victims in today's mass shooting in Maryland.

This is America.

Not in a position to watch the news just this second. Saw a comment in another thread about a shooting. So was coming in here to see if there was a comment on it. So another mass shooting? I mean given how fast they're increasing, and how much larger the body counts are becoming. I shouldn't be surprised, but still.

I know it's asking for a lot, but hoping not many were injured, let alone killed. Especially hoping this isn't a school shooting.
 
Not in a position to watch the news just this second. Saw a comment in another thread about a shooting. So was coming in here to see if there was a comment on it. So another mass shooting? I mean given how fast they're increasing, and how much larger the body counts are becoming. I shouldn't be surprised, but still.

I know it's asking for a lot, but hoping not many were injured, let alone killed. Especially hoping this isn't a school shooting.

Not a school shooting. But a shooting at a Newspaper. Several dead and several injured.
 
Fox is speculating it might be retaliation against fake news or something. :(
 
Fox is speculating it might be retaliation against fake news or something. :(

Finally watching the story on it. I wouldn't be surprised. Police haven't released a motive yet, so best not to jump to conclusions.

However in an America where Trump called the press the enemy of America, it's hard not to have that come to mind.

I remember saying that at some point a judge is going to get shot. When Trump said if anything happens it's the fault of the judge who shot down his travel ban.

For good or bad, a president's voice has a lot of power. If, not confirmed yet, but if this is the motive. That's what happens when a president calls civilians "enemies of America", because he disagrees with them. Especially when your supporters are fanatical in their support of you.
 
One of the Fox guys had a legitimate concern of there being copycats if this turns out to be politically motivated. :(
 
Oh good. Thoughts and prayers from the President, because those worked so well after the last shooting. :(
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,271
Messages
22,077,671
Members
45,878
Latest member
Vlachya
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"