herakles
Sidekick
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2005
- Messages
- 1,724
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
Well we now know who Jihadi John is.
Go figure he's a rich kid.
ALLL Kuwaitis are rich!
Well we now know who Jihadi John is.
Go figure he's a rich kid.
It's a rather interesting article. I think it paints Islam in a little too much of a negative light, but I do think that it makes a lot of valid points.I hope everyone read the 'What ISIS Wants' article in the latest Atlantic monthly. It was enlightening in the most disturbing way.
Very true, but I think that the author should have been a bit more clear on that point because I think a lot of people will see it more broadly on Islam as a whole. Like I said, overall, the article has a lot of very interesting points that I wish that people would pick up on and it's overall very well written.Well, it's only discussing the beliefs of a small subset within the subset of Salafism.
is grounded in realism, and argues that not understanding what is happening is very dangerous, especially if fighting a war, one must fight the war that is real, not the invented one that one wishes to fight. Perhaps ironically, your [writings] ... are most dangerous to the Muslims (not that it is necessarily meant to be so on your behalf), yet they are celebrated by Muslims who see them as pieces that speak the truth that so many try to deny, but also because [Muslims] know that deep down the idealists of the world will still ignore them.
What stands out to me that others don't seem to discuss much, is how the Islamic State, Osama [bin Laden] and others are operating as if they are reading from a script that was written 1,400 years ago. They not only follow these prophecies, but plan ahead based upon them. One would therefore assume that the enemies of Islam would note this and prepare adequately, but [its] almost as if they feel that playing along would mean that they believe in the prophecies too, and so they ignore them and go about things their own way. ... [The] enemies of the Muslims may be aware of what the Muslims are planning, but it won't benefit them at all as they prefer to either keep their heads in the sand, or to fight their imaginary war based upon rational freedom-loving democrats vs. irrational evil terrorist madmen. With this in mind, maybe you can understand to some degree one of the reasons why many Muslims will share your piece. Its not because we don't understand what it is saying in terms of how to defeat the Muslims, rather its because we know that those in charge will ignore it and screw things up anyway.
ISIS has bulldozed an ancient archeological Nimrod site.
Im so sick of these trolls!!!
They're the most boring people in history. Unimaginative, regressive, and unattractive.
In the Netherlands, this dying woman was granted her final wish: a view of a Rembrandt painting.
I just want to let that contrast between civilisation and murderous barbarity hang.
I felt just a sick when the Taliban blew up Bamiyan Buddhas....just sick, sick, sick.
It reminds me of when the Muslim Brotherhood started talking about destroying the pyramids in Egypt. Muslims tried to destroy the pyramids in the 1100's and after eight months all they managed to accomplish was putting a gash in the smallest Giza pyramid. After that they just said screw it, and went home.
As nuclear negotiations between Iran and U.S. allies go down to the wire, the Islamic Republic has accused America of killing two of its advisers in the ground war in Iraq with an unmanned aerial vehiclethough U.S. officials say the allegation has no merit.
The Associated Press reports:
The claim came as negotiators on Monday attempted to reach a deal on Iran's contested nuclear program, which hard-liners in the Islamic Republic have opposed as giving away too much to the West.
The Guard said on its sepahnews.ir website the strike happened March 23, just after the U.S.-led coalition began airstrikes to support Iraqi forces trying to retake the Islamic State-held city of Tikrit. It identified the dead as Ali Yazdani and Hadi Jafari, saying they were buried Sunday. It called them advisers, without elaborating on whether Iran contacted Iraqi or U.S. forces after the strike.
Tikritthe birthplace of Saddam Hussein and an ISIS stronghold in Iraq's so-called Sunni Trianglehas become a focus of major operations, with the U.S. using airstrikes to target ISIS fighters there since mid-March.
Several Iraqi media outlets have also reported that U.S. airstrikes killed several members of the Iraqi security forceswhich, along with independently operating Iraqi *****e militias, are coordinating their attacks on ISIS with advice from "Gen. Qassem Soleimani, commander of the elite Quds Force of Iran's Revolutionary Guard," according to the AP.
The U.S. embassy in Baghdad has denied both sets of allegations:
"The international coalition is aimed at Daesh only," using an alternate Arabic acronym for the Islamic State group.
"All airstrikes are carried out at the request of the Iraqi government and in full coordination with the (Iraqi) Ministry of Defense," the embassy said, without directly addressing the Iranian claim.
The Terror Strategist: Secret Files Reveal the Structure of Islamic State
Very true, but I think that the author should have been a bit more clear on that point because I think a lot of people will see it more broadly on Islam as a whole. Like I said, overall, the article has a lot of very interesting points that I wish that people would pick up on and it's overall very well written.
So why did it start in Syria?