Discussion: Voting Rights and Election Law

USA Today - Supreme Court rules against Alabama in battle over race, redistricting
The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against Alabama in a challenge to its recently redrawn congressional districts, affirming a lower court decision that ruled the map likely denied Black voters in that state an additional member in the U.S. House of Representatives.

At issue are the congressional boundaries Alabama lawmakers drew following the 2020 census that include one district out of seven with a majority of Black voters. African Americans account for more than a quarter of the state's overall population.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the court's 5-4 opinion and was joined in part by Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Brett Kavanaugh. Four of the court's conservatives − Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett and Sam Alito − dissented.
 
These attempts at twisting the vote are very unscrupulous. Sad to see.
 
It really is. Instead of cheating, try giving people what they actually want.
 
The SCOTUS ruling is very surprising. Wonder what got Roberts and Kavanaugh to go with it.
 
Democracy Docket: “UPDATE: Allen v. Milligan is already impacting other cases. A federal judge just asked parties in a lawsuit challenging Georgia's congressional and legislative maps to submit briefing on how the Supreme Court's decision in Allen affects the case: New Filing in Georgia State Conference of the NAACP v. Georgia” “Besides Alabama, Louisiana is immediately impacted by this decision. Last June, SCOTUS paused a lawsuit over Louisiana’s congressional map pending a decision in Allen. Now litigation will resume, creating an opportunity for fairer representation for the state’s Black voters.” “The U.S. Supreme Court's decision today will impact ongoing redistricting litigation in: Alabama Arkansas Georgia Kansas Louisiana Michigan Mississippi North Dakota Texas Washington”
 
Democracy Docket: “UPDATE: Allen v. Milligan is already impacting other cases. A federal judge just asked parties in a lawsuit challenging Georgia's congressional and legislative maps to submit briefing on how the Supreme Court's decision in Allen affects the case: New Filing in Georgia State Conference of the NAACP v. Georgia” “Besides Alabama, Louisiana is immediately impacted by this decision. Last June, SCOTUS paused a lawsuit over Louisiana’s congressional map pending a decision in Allen. Now litigation will resume, creating an opportunity for fairer representation for the state’s Black voters.” “The U.S. Supreme Court's decision today will impact ongoing redistricting litigation in: Alabama Arkansas Georgia Kansas Louisiana Michigan Mississippi North Dakota Texas Washington”
This, exactly. Be fair.
 
Democracy Docket: “UPDATE: Allen v. Milligan is already impacting other cases. A federal judge just asked parties in a lawsuit challenging Georgia's congressional and legislative maps to submit briefing on how the Supreme Court's decision in Allen affects the case: New Filing in Georgia State Conference of the NAACP v. Georgia” “Besides Alabama, Louisiana is immediately impacted by this decision. Last June, SCOTUS paused a lawsuit over Louisiana’s congressional map pending a decision in Allen. Now litigation will resume, creating an opportunity for fairer representation for the state’s Black voters.” “The U.S. Supreme Court's decision today will impact ongoing redistricting litigation in: Alabama Arkansas Georgia Kansas Louisiana Michigan Mississippi North Dakota Texas Washington”
Good to see the knock on effects too. :up:
 
RedistrictNet: "Members of the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians and the Spirit Lake Tribe will head to court on Monday to argue North Dakota's legislative map violates Section 2 of the VRA."
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"