Lord
All Mighty
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2011
- Messages
- 15,476
- Reaction score
- 12
- Points
- 31
and before I watched Tangled, I was dead set against 3d/computer animated films. I had always preferred the traditional 2d/hand drawn animation of the Renaissance era and before.
In fact, that was one main reason why I skipped Tangled in the theaters. I didn't like the fact they went the computer animated route. For me, I had always found the 3d/computer animated films "lifeless."
But, of course, after watching the film, I feel like I would have enjoyed it less had it not been 3d/computer animated. It really just made the characters feel more alive and real. Rapunzel, especially, really felt like a real girl, not just some animated princess. And that made her more relatable, imo.
Same with Anna and Elsa. I connect and relate to those 3 princesses way more than I ever did with the prior princesses ( with the possible exception of Belle ).
Really? I think all the films Pixar had released up until then were films that only worked in 3D and were enhanced due to that, like Toy Story and The Incredibles, with Tangled and Frozen i didn't really feel like the 3D added anything to them, if anything i think they would have worked just fine in 2D, if not better. While i really liked Frozen, i never found Tangled to be all that extraordinary, and i felt more connected with Wreck-It Ralph than those 2.
Yeah...GotG sounds bonkers, and I love Edgar Wright and Paul Rudd so that's that.
I hope though that these future movies will look better, cinematography wise. I didn't like the cinematography for Avenger, Iron Man 3 or Thor 2 (which was the better of the three). Cap 2 looks ok, but I hope James Gunn and Edgar deliver movies that look beautiful, and not just a digital affair. And trust me, I'm a believer in digital cameras but the Marvel movies are kinda dropping the ball. I want something to look like Skyfall, which used the Arri.
Maybe it was due to the pacing, but i actually enjoyed the cinematography in Iron Man 3