Wall-weasle
Civilian
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2008
- Messages
- 51
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 1
Obviously, you don't know much about theatre. No one can alter a play script in any way without the writer's permission. Once the playwright has written a play and premiered in a theatre, it cannot be changed. Even during the rehearsals, only the playwright can change the play. It might be different in the States, but this is generally the rule with plays. The director can change how people deliver the lines in the script, but he cannot change those words given to a character in the play. Now, after a century or so, the copyright on a play is no longer effective in the sense that the play can be altered without the playwright's (or the family of the playwright or publishing company after the playwright's death) permission. Scripts for Theatre do get altered, but it is the playwright who makes these changes. An example is Oscar Wilde with his play, The Importance of Being Earnest. It originally had four acts, but the theatre place he wished to play it at wanted him to shorten it to three acts, which Wilde did. And, I can keep ranting like this because it happens to be the profession in Theatre I am most interested in, but you probably found one tiny flaw in all I wrote and will not consider anything else I wrote, so I'll stop and let you rant some more, but I won't comment anymore on this.who cares?
who cares about theatre... I'm saying that 70% of the tripe that makes it to TV, is not worth the salary the writer earned for delivering such nonsense
This is different from other forms of entertainment how?
HELLO, directors in theatre have this perogative too
I really don't care anymore. It's like if the police strike for a legit reason, nobody really cares,,, until their houses start getting robbed.
What I'm saying... is unions should never strike for long term. Hurting your producers in the wallet is fair... but hurting your audience, your market is a serious no no, they are not the ones at fault, and one should not be making them pay the price. Again, I think these writers get paid too much for the crap that is released on TV (that's a generalization).
I probably wasn't very clear with this, but what I was trying to get at in my last post was that we as audience members barely see what the writer actually wanted on screen. They pretty much provide the building blocks for the movie and from there, the director picks and chooses what he wants to keep or add to. So, it's not the writers who are getting paid for crap, it's the directors. As we say in theatre, which may be more true with the film industry, "If a show is bad, it's always the director who is to blame." (which is just figurative)