Do you support..

[Sean Adisano]

whats a president

 

[The Chairman]

Depending on their stances on issues that interest and are important to me, I'd vote for a woman. Though I'm not against Hilary because of her agenda, but because she is a smug, uncharismatic and heartless *****. She went to a 9 / 11 memorial at The College Of Staten Island and demanded to be let in before all the families of the victims.

 

[Kritish]

Supporting someone due to their gender is awfully sexist, who gives a ****? As long as she's a good president I don't care.

 

[Dwarf lord]

Where's the choice for Yes, but not Hillary?

 

[dpm07]

Don't care. Man, woman, whoever is best for the job is who I vote for

This is reflective of my position as well.

 

[jaguarr]

I will support the most qualified candidate who demonstrates that they have the capability to unify and lead our country and see to our best interests on all levels. If that's a woman, a man, a goat, a single-cell organism or a banana peel, then awesome...that's who I'm voting for.

jag

 

[Obi-Ron]

Makes no difference to me.

However, I do support Lewis Black's proposal for picking a president: Throw a dart at a map of the United States, go into the jungle, find a monkey, take it on a plane, parachute it out to the location the dart hit, and whoever the first person the monkey touches, that is the new president.

They could save some time and just use the monkey.

 

[X-Chick]

Don't care. Man, woman, whoever is best for the job is who I vote for

I agree. Though, giving it some thought, it seems like a woman might be better for the job. They're more level-headed (depending on circumstances) and are biologically programed to put others before themselves. Therefore, a woman might actually think of the country and the citizens rather than what's best for herself and her position.

But for the most part, I don't care either way.