Loki882
Avenger
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2013
- Messages
- 21,276
- Reaction score
- 147
- Points
- 48
As many have alluded to in this thread, their comic versions are always better than the movie versions.
Loki in the comics is about as bad as bad guys get. He's scum and the most deceitful person in the Marvel Universe, but the last Thor movie tried to turn him good for a brief while, which was just a horrible decision. Thankfully they amended that at the end of the film by showing his true intentions.
Red Skull is better in the comics, but I liked what they did with him in the movie.
Crimson Dynamo is obviously better in the comics. I don't know why they tried to combine a character nobody ever cared about (Blacklash) with him to make this Mickey Rourke nonsense, but it ruined the character. There's your example of a made-up villain not working out at all. Same with Killian/Mandarin. He's Iron Man's arch nemesis, but they made him a joke in the movie. Malekith, from what I remember, shows up even less than Kurse in the comics. He's a decent villain but wouldn't make the cut of Thor's top 10 enemies. I feel like they just put him in the movie so they could have free reign to alter him any way they wanted. Even though he's not a standout in the comics, he sucked in the movie.
I'm starting to see everyone's point. Marvel really, really sucks at handling villains. I would say the only one that exceeded his comic version was Obadiah Stane.
No, Loki isn't that way in the comics. At least he hasn't been that way for the last decade or so. He's very much in the "amoral" or "ambiguous" category these days, and thank god for that. He's so much more interesting that way.