This is horrible casting. He's too pretty looking and I don't really get his appeal at all. But it feels like he's being thrown into every damn big scale movie now...like someone said, over exposed.
I got the impression initially about this film, that Dracula would be more of an anti-hero, someone who you could like and not like at the same time, but with Worthington cast, I have this feeling that he's gonna be full-on sympathetic character and his transformation into a vampire is going to be such a tragedy and the after effect of it will be treated as such a tragedy "OH NO! What have I done!?" and all that nonsense.
There's a potential to turn Dracula into such an evil, terrible person when he transforms that would be absolutely brilliant to see on screen.
The fact of the matter is that Vlad Tepes was a savage warlord who killed his enemies and his own people in some of the most savage and sadistic ways possible. I have no idea how they can make this man sympathetic without taking vast liberties with history. That to me though would be like making a movie about Ted Bundy or Hitler and saying "You know...he wasn't THAT bad of a guy. In fact, he was kinda...nice!"
However, I like that they're incorporating his vampiric origin from the book, though in a somewhat skewed way. In the novel, he becomes a student of the black arts at the Scholomance, mastering magic and alchemy, later becoming a military man, a vicious warlord. He uses the powers he learned to come back from the dead as a vampire. It seems that with the film, he gets his vampiric powers from going to the Scholomance to defeat the turks. It's an interesting idea, but he has to become corrupt and evil and LIKE IT for it to really have an effect for me.
We'll see, i guess.