tyler-durden
Superhero
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2007
- Messages
- 7,734
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Why are they going with Ratner there are so many good directors out there?
Ratner. Oh boy. There are few directors out there that lack the vision, talent, and style that Ratner does. He is grandmaster of the hack society.
Is Escape a Fox property or something? Sounds like one of their typical stupid moves.
Who doesn't?![]()
Brett Ratner said:Well, first Im going to give Snake an annoying sidekick so there can be a stream of non-stop comic banter between them.
Then Ill make the character of the missing President a total idiot who goes around choking on pretzles and mispronouncing the word nuclear so that the movie has some of my famous political subtext.
Then Ill just blow something up every ten minutes or so until the end of the movie (which Ill go ahead change completely for no good reason whatsoever. Hmmm, maybe itll turn out that Snake isnt really a criminal, but a good guy that has been working for the government all along!)
Wow! Remakes are so easy! Someone bring me another Hooker and some more Blow

1) Is there anything to really HATE Brett Ratner for? He just does the job; he doesn't have anything in him that's memorably good, but nothing that's memorably bad about his lack of style either. Steven Spielberg once said that a director's really done his job if you don't even notice him. I think that applies to Ratner.
2) For that matter, unlike many action directors today, Ratner knows how to hold the camera ****ing still.
Based on these two elements, I think I shall transform myself into a Ratner Defender.![]()
lol, ya I feel ya on that #2. I hate that shaky camera technique,ala bourne series and some others. Its just soo annoying and hard to follow the action.1) Is there anything to really HATE Brett Ratner for? He just does the job; he doesn't have anything in him that's memorably good, but nothing that's memorably bad about his lack of style either. Steven Spielberg once said that a director's really done his job if you don't even notice him. I think that applies to Ratner.
2) For that matter, unlike many action directors today, Ratner knows how to hold the camera ****ing still.
Based on these two elements, I think I shall transform myself into a Ratner Defender.![]()
X3 is the only real reason I dont like him, he just butchered the movie and it was a dissapointment being that it was the final film of the trilogy.
Corretion for #2 Directors dont really do the camera work themselves they more "direct" (not trying to be snide!) the cameramen what to do. Rarely are they hands on interms of physically holding the camera and capturing footage.

Other than the producer the director has the last say on stuff such as the script and that being who the writers are. So yea he played a large part in the failings of X3.Did he really butcher it? It was a lousy script in the first place; he just shot the damn thing. The only decision he actually made during the production that I disagree with was changing Beast's final fate to the whole "UN position" thing instead of teaching at the school.
Other than the producer the director has the last say on stuff such as the script and that being who the writers are. So yea he played a large part in the failings of X3.
But you know the story of the X3 production - he was hired when filming was set to start in three weeks. Fox was looking for someone who would shoot the script the producers had already agreed to. They were determined that the movie had to be shot right then no matter what. Ratner only managed to make one major change - moving the prison set piece to the finale instead of the middle of the film, and creating the "rolling truck prison" in the middle instead. So he can't really be blamed for the script because he explicitly got the job due to the fact that he was willing to take what they had and run with it. Matthew Vaughn, in comparison, left the movie specifically because he wasn't willing to do that.
But you know the story of the X3 production - he was hired when filming was set to start in three weeks. Fox was looking for someone who would shoot the script the producers had already agreed to. They were determined that the movie had to be shot right then no matter what. Ratner only managed to make one major change - moving the prison set piece to the finale instead of the middle of the film, and creating the "rolling truck prison" in the middle instead. So he can't really be blamed for the script because he explicitly got the job due to the fact that he was willing to take what they had and run with it. Matthew Vaughn, in comparison, left the movie specifically because he wasn't willing to do that.
None of his other movies are really that noteworthy anyways. The Rush Hour movies were all Chan, Tucker, and their rapport. You really don't need a good director to pull those movies off as it was the quality of the jokes and scenarios and the actors themselves. Both are experienced so Ratner didn't bring much other than his MTV video direction experience.
I think Red Dragon was probably his best movie. Again, he's just aping an existing style, but he pulls it off pretty well.