• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Events losing steam?

JewishHobbit

Avenger
Joined
Aug 4, 2003
Messages
26,683
Reaction score
0
Points
56
I thought this was a very interesting article. It also covers more than just Event sales.

I'm actually glad that normal titles are outselling events. Maybe Marvel will lay off them a little if this trend continues.

Also, I like that Batwing and Green Arrow show that a writer/artist or storyline shift can bring a sales bump like a new #1 can. Just promote the tar out of it and it might work out (like with Green Arrow). Tired of all the stupid relaunches.
 
I'd love to see events de-emphasized. I don't mind following them; rather, it's the times I want to ignore them that they really bug me. I'm not interested in Inhumanity at all, so I'm avoiding the main Inhuman title, but I'm still gonna be stuck with a bunch of tie-ins in my usual comics--pieces of a puzzle I have no interest in solving, basically. That gets annoying.
 
As long as these events sell well, or even "reasonably" well, we're gonna see them more and more all the time...

:csad:
 
I got tired of events back during the Clone Saga. :p

I don't mind every so often but constant events are annoying.
 
Events used to be unique and special but now they are not anymore.

Everything is done on a massive scale. Runs by certain writers are treated like events in themselves. Guys like Hickman and Remender work on such a massive scale story wise that events have become very vanilla in comparison.

I miss the days of the self contained summer bi weekly style events. They were the start and finish point for many plots.
 
Yeah, it occurred to me the other day that Infinity was basically just stuff from Hickman's Avengers plot plus Thanos. It really didn't seem like it needed an event to itself, but it would've been a great arc of Avengers.
 
I don't see a problem with the events. They really don't happen that often, especially if you are a follower of only certain titles. Infinity was mainly an Avengers event; and, Battle of the Atom was exclusive to only four of the X-titles. It used to be an event effected a whole lot more than that. If sales of events are dwindling (and, sorry, I didn't read the article, as I'm writing this on a break at school), it's more due to the limits of these more aptly titled mini-events. (Flashpoint was a true event. Forever Evil is more of a mini-event to me, unless you want to count the villain tie-in for that one month.)

Oh, I loved Marvel's last two events, too. Infinity was so much different than Marvel's previous events. So many things were happening at once, and tie-in books were really essential to enjoying the story. Inhumanity hasn't exactly thrilled me yet; but, it's off-shoot from Infinity and not something I feel I'd have to read if I wanted to stop after Infinity #6. Battle of the Atom was more a neat read. It felt like a natural progression of the story Bendis had been doing in his books. I guess X-Men and Wolverine & The X-Men readers might be upset that it went into their books.
 
As a Wolverine & the X-Men reader, I wasn't upset; I just dropped the series for the duration of Battle of the Atom.
 
Yeah, it occurred to me the other day that Infinity was basically just stuff from Hickman's Avengers plot plus Thanos. It really didn't seem like it needed an event to itself, but it would've been a great arc of Avengers.

That was my big complaint the whole time through. The space stuff should have been an arc of Avengers; the Thanos stuff should have been an arc of New Avenger.

Phaedrus45 said:
I don't see a problem with the events. They really don't happen that often, especially if you are a follower of only certain titles. Infinity was mainly an Avengers event; and, Battle of the Atom was exclusive to only four of the X-titles. It used to be an event effected a whole lot more than that. If sales of events are dwindling (and, sorry, I didn't read the article, as I'm writing this on a break at school), it's more due to the limits of these more aptly titled mini-events.

BofA was only 4 issues but 12 or 14 issues long. It wasn't a MASSIVE event, but a decent sized one if you didn't buy all 4 titles.

Infinity ran through Avengers, New Avengers, Nova, Thunderbolts, Guardians of the Galaxy, Wolverine & the X-Men, Captain Marvel, and Avengers Assemble. Not to mention the core mini, the Heist mini, and the Hunt mini. I'd say that ranks as a major event.

Prior to that was Age of Ultron with the core mini plus single issue tie-ins for 6 or 7 titles. And its fallout was felt in Indestructible Hulk, Superior Spider-Man, and a couple other books. Minor, yes, but still an event.

And that one came right on the heels of Avenger vs. X-Men with its 12 issue plus tie-ins in every major Avenger and X-Men comic.


Remember not that long ago when Events were once a year Summer deals? Yeah, they kinda got away from that so badly it's frustrating. If you only stick with one genre I suppose it isn't so bad, but when you only read snippets from each genre (an X-Book here, an Avenger book there, a fringe book on the side) you have to start picking up a bunch of crap you don't want.


Phaedrus45 said:
(Flashpoint was a true event. Forever Evil is more of a mini-event to me, unless you want to count the villain tie-in for that one month.)

In addition to the Villains Month issues, Forever Evil also includes 7 or 8 months of Justice League, Justice League of America, Justice League Dark, Pandora, Phantom Stranger, Constantine, and tie-in issues of Suicide Squad, Teen Titans. Also the core mini and the 6-issue Arkham War and Rogues Rebellion. Plus, I guess you could probably throw Trinity War in with this since it was the official lead-in to the event.

I'd say Forever Evil is on the scale of Civil War. But at least DC went 2 years between events. They had 4 or 5 part crossovers between two titles here and there, but not huge events.

Phaedrus45 said:
Oh, I loved Marvel's last two events, too. Infinity was so much different than Marvel's previous events. So many things were happening at once, and tie-in books were really essential to enjoying the story.

I hated Infinity. The requirement to read two other books to understand the event was frustrating. All that money spent and the story wasn't even any good. The two plots were pointlessly thrown together distracting from each other, Thanos was written horribly, the big bad Builders ended up being just another 2-dimensional alien threat. There was no character development and one heck of a Dues Ex Machina (which people fried Bendis over but praise Hickman?).

Honestly, I felt Infinity was one of the worst events to come out since the Bendis era events began. The only event that I'll confidently put below it is Age of Ultron.

Inhumanity hasn't exactly thrilled me yet; but, it's off-shoot from Infinity and not something I feel I'd have to read if I wanted to stop after Infinity #6.

Yeah, I skipping Inhumanity. I've not felt any need to bother with it.

Battle of the Atom was more a neat read. It felt like a natural progression of the story Bendis had been doing in his books. I guess X-Men and Wolverine & The X-Men readers might be upset that it went into their books.

I also disliked Battle of the Atom. It was horribly drawn out, didn't add anything to the franchise or any of the titles, and what it DID effect I didn't like. Kitty's turning on Wolverine's school was laughable. The O5 being trapped in the present makes no real sense. And so far nothing's happened with the future characters who stayed in the present. And none of them were all that interesting. Between that and Infinity, I was on comic frustration overload.

Actually the last minute reveal of SHIELD having sentinels was interesting. I'll give it that.

And the funny thing was, it felt like a proper extension of Bendis' X-Men run, but it wasn't even a Bendis event. It was a Jason Aaron story that Bendis pulled from for his stories.

runawayboulder said:
Events used to be unique and special but now they are not anymore.

Exactly. Events were special because they were important stories that changed things; and they were epic. Nowadays they're just another story. I mean, Infinity changed nothing save giving us some Inhumans. Age of Ultron changed nothing at all really. Battle of the Atom accomplished a little more but not much, and that could have been done in a 3 or 4 issue arc. Nowadays Events just feel like gigantic interruptions with no real consequence or pay off for those interruptions. At least with events like Civil War, Secret Invasion, and to a lesser extent Siege, the story reshaped the Marvel Universe. Ever since they've just been annoying.
 
Age of Ultron changed nothing at all really.

It destroyed the space time continuum and led to Angela and Spider-Man 2099 crossing over to the 616, with more to likely follow. It remains to be seen how much of an effect there is. But then again, this is Marvel Comics we are talking about and there is $$$ to be made. :oldrazz:
 
I thought Infinity was really well done and a worthwhile event..it was epic..yes it was mostly self contained to the Avengers and GOTG but it sets up a lot going forward.

The model to me is always Annhilation . Frankly most of the events i've disliked have been BMB ones and , of course Civil War.
 
I loved everything from Annihilation through War of Kings.
 
It destroyed the space time continuum and led to Angela and Spider-Man 2099 crossing over to the 616, with more to likely follow. It remains to be seen how much of an effect there is. But then again, this is Marvel Comics we are talking about and there is $$$ to be made. :oldrazz:

We've not really seen anything as a result of the Space Time continuum other than in Indestructible Hulk (which I don't read). And since when do you need a major event to pull characters into the 616? It used to be that writers would do that in a random issue. Halloween Jack from X-Men 2099 was pulled into the 616 in a single issue of X-Force... in flashback. Bendis did it with the 05 in a panel or two. That's not exactly a universe shattering, epic change made there. Heck, no one even remembers that it happened.
 
I don't think DC should be put on the same place as Marvel when it comes to this, DC barelly make any major event, at most they will do one once a year, Marvel does big event after big event and rarelly cools off
 
I got tired of events back during the Clone Saga. :p

I don't mind every so often but constant events are annoying.

From World War Hulk to Civil War to Secret Invasion to Sin Saga (The Asgardian hammers) to Avengers Vs Xmen to on and on and on...........

They never stop!! I am sick of the spin-off books that go with the main story..........

I think reads are seeing this for what it is.....a money grab more that for a good story.
 
Events losing steam? God, I really hope so.

Despite Infinity actually being good, Marvel has abused events so badly that they cannot seem to tell an important story outside of them. Additionally, there have been so, so many worthless/pointless tie-in issues. I swear, half of Avengers for the past decade has been throw-away event tie-ins (Secret Invasion being the worst offender here). Not only does it disrupt the flow of a series and prevents long-term planning from the author but it weakens the ability of a title to stand alone and tell a clear and complete story. Re-reading Bendis' New Avengers, for example, has been monumentally challenging due to the events every ten issues or so and the companion titles with exceedingly questionable continuity. Further, it feels like many great arcs were forced into premature conclusions to make room for the "next big event".

I agree with all of the above posters: We need a LONG break from events. With two a year, they've become anything but special or exciting.
 
X-Men managed to pull numerous characters from alternate timelines and realities into the 616 without a major crossover event as well.
 
I too have had it with these events! "Secret Invasion" was the worst and led me to dropping books cause i was buying crap i never bought to keep up with the story. that pissed me off especially when the big payoff was " Norman Osborne with a gun!!that's it!?!? That's all i got!

I dont mind how it was back in the day like with "Acts of vengeance"where it was self contained and it didn't involved the stand alone books, but when you start having to buy this book and that to keep up with the event forget it!

Sadly i dont see marvel ever doing away with it as long as the demand is there they will supply it! it all comes down to money! but i have had it with these events.
 
The big problem I've found is that it's the same characters doing the same events over and over. You have Wolverine, the Avengers and a few guest stars and it'll likely spend half the time in New York. The reason I liked Annihilation and onwards was that they used so many characters that you normally don't see and it took place in areas that you rarely see in any book.
 
I was surprised when Age Of Ultron turned out to be a Wolverine centric event.
 
I thought Age of Ultron would be more interesting than what it was. "It's the end of the world but we'll time travel back and fix it." It doesn't work perfectly but :p
 
I was really into it until they traveled back in time. Basically, when Hitch left, that's when I stopped liking it. Not because of Hitch, but that was when the plot shifted to full on stank mode.
 
I was really into it until they traveled back in time. Basically, when Hitch left, that's when I stopped liking it. Not because of Hitch, but that was when the plot shifted to full on stank mode.

Seconded. I thought the first issue was pretty good but the event went to crap so, so fast.
 
Events got tiresome over 3 years ago, they really saturated the comic market with those

Secret Invasion gets a few good marks because it was adapted in a fun way in Avengers Earth Mightiest Heroes
Other than that I only like two events:
Acts of Vengeance (Batman references :awesome:), and it didn't feel like an event
Civil War is the other one. It's a mess, but an interesting one

From DC's end I hardly read events out of Crisis on Infinite Earths (mostly a boring mess, and I love the team working on it) and Flashpoint (a mess, I really enjoyed thanks to the animated feature)
 
House of M could have ended really interestingly if they had gone with the original plan of letting everyone remember both timelines. Instead they decided to kill of most of the mutants and even then 99% of them were characters we never heard of anyway.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"