Oh please, do elaborate.lol comic book ...mov....ie
Oh please, do elaborate.lol comic book ...mov....ie
The Dark World blows Iron Man Three out of the water, visually. It's not even close. Alan Taylor = chess, the rest of the MCU directors = checkers.
The sets were shown in some of the promos; looked huge and damn impressive. In some you could see the green screen at the end of the corridors and the like.Was any part of Asgard not done in front of a green screen?
i wrote 10 of 10 for a comic book movie and it got censored cause its also a websiteOh please, do elaborate.
I'm sorry but... I don't understand what you're saying at all.i wrote 10 of 10 for a comic book movie and it got censored cause its also a website
I thought the cinematography in the movie was pretty weak. Maybe it's because i saw it in 3D, I just recognised "fake" way too often. Was any part of Asgard not done in front of a green screen?
I've also seen some beautiful movies this year. Oblivion and Gravity are magnificent in the cinematography department. Man of Steel, Elysium and Pacific Rim also look much better than T:TDW. A case can be made for Star Trek into Darkness.
But if you're only comparing this movie to other MCU films, as half the people in this thread seem to, then you will have different standards.

10 of 10 for a comic book movie and 8 of ten for a scifi/action movie...just for the non comic bookfans;-)So what do you give the film again I'm sorry your post kinda through.me for a loop. Also can you tell is what all you liked and/or disliked about it if you don't mind.
A mixed set can look just as fake, and indeed that was the case here. But I admit my problem could be the 3d... on the other hand, gravity was beautiful.Mjölnir;27150249 said:Plenty of shots were made with sets, so I guess the effects were pretty good if you can't tell the difference.![]()
And as a side note, you're not not alone in having brought up Hemsworth's voice as a main point in a review. One that's on RT has done that as well (well, I've read less than a handful so more might have done it). You were polar opposites in opinion though.![]()

A mixed set can look just as fake, and indeed that was the case here. But I admit my problem could be the 3d... on the other hand, gravity was beautiful.
Hemsworth's voice isn't even remotely as special as the Batman voice so very different expectations on people bringing it up.You're not alone in bringing up Bale's Batman voice, many have a polar opposite opinion though
Hemsworth's fake voice in the movie fits in well with the comedic tone of the film.
I'm sorry but... I don't understand what you're saying at all.

ty=).*stuff
![]()
I'm sorry but... I don't understand what you're saying at all.
now where is whedon bashing the movie because of the one mjolnir joke?
anyhow...************** a 10...a scifi action movie for others id say a 8 of 10
Apologies, bad usage of words. You are more accurate with what you've labeled them as of course, though I guess my issue is that the trailers for The Avengers and Iron Man 3 somewhat hinted at a much more darker/serious film(s) than what we eventually got, which I guess was the idea in the first place from the minds of the promotion/marketing department.lol
I'm not sure if anyone has asked yet but are the action scenes actually filmed in a coherent manner with long established shots or is it that hyper-edited shaky cam crap where you have to squint to make out what's going on?
^ I figured the humor was blown out of proportion, I remember The Avengers being labeled a "laugh fest" and a kiddie movie when it came out. Presently most people would agree that the humor was fairly balanced and entertaining is a more fitting word than "kiddie".
You mean his opinion is more valid than any negative ones? It's not blown out of proportion, it's a matter of opinion. You might find the humour to be perfectly fine, someone else doesn't. Once again I see this bias in here.
The general consensus is that some of the humor is misplaced, but some people down right call the film a "comedy".
Which seems like a huge over exaggeration, no bias here just common sense.
It was. It still is. The amount and type of humor, the way it is used is the same as in every other MCU movie. Or in Raiders or Star Wars for that matter.^ I figured the humor was blown out of proportion, I remember The Avengers being labeled a "laugh fest" and a kiddie movie when it came out. Presently most people would agree that the humor was fairly balanced and entertaining is a more fitting word than "kiddie".
