Wait, so...this is a film about puberty...but it's also not for kids. Doesn't that just seem like the audience that topic may be most relevant to...?
The Ben casting I am iffy on now I'll admit so I should revise my opinion a bit.
I wouldn't have had any issue if Sue were played by a black actress but Hollywood seems to think only one black actor in a prominent role per film or the film turns into a "black movie."
Anyone know whats going on with IMDB changing Tim Blake Nelson's credit to Dr Allen? Could they have scrapped the character being Harvey Elder? (not that the character looks to be anything like the comic character)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1502712/
Edit:
In the video they published this week they still refered to him as Harvey Elder
[YT]0hxLVE6EW4U[/YT]
So not sure whats going on.
Anyone know whats going on with IMDB changing Tim Blake Nelson's credit to Dr Allen? Could they have scrapped the character being Harvey Elder? (not that the character looks to be anything like the comic character)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1502712/
Edit:
In the video they published this week they still refered to him as Harvey Elder
[YT]0hxLVE6EW4U[/YT]
So not sure whats going on.
Yes, but it does change their relationship.
Oh, absolutely, and I'm not the biggest fan of it being in this film, but the guy seems baffled by the concept of them having that kind of relationship.
That's because those changes aren't even remotely interesting. Jamie Bell is not and never will be "the muscle." Doom being the fifth member of the Fantastic Four yet again is lazy and unimaginative writing.I understand that in the 21st Century more diversity is needed. I have no problem with this provided the core source material is respected. I don't have a problem with MBJ or the adoption angle - DigificWriter stated an excellent argument on this issue earlier on this forum. I do however have a problem with Ben Grimm being a pipsqueek turned exhibitionist and Doom being a Storm family adoptee blogger who turns into a krill eating Tim Story version 2.0.
Then why is it so hard for you to ignore them???So it's wrong to try an make this place a little more inviting to those that are interested in this movie? The comic fans opinions are not superior or more valid to the non-fans.
And while it is okay to be critical of the movie, you have to realize just how much of a toxic forum this has become.
Kate Mara is 32.Kinberg has said (and I cringe to even paste this):
"And the FF’s transformation, for him, was a literalisation of that coming of age. To make them older, in their thirties or forties, would have taken away from what he wanted to do dramatically.”
"It’s almost like if this is a coming of age story for these characters, the next movie is about what it is to be a grown-up in the world…”
And Josh Tank has said:
"When I was in middle school and high school, I was over 100 pounds overweight," he said. "I had a condition called gynecomastia — I had really big man boobs — and I got a surgery for it. My whole adolescence was hating myself and feeling suicidal. I was made fun of by a lot of other kids in such a way that I didn't feel like I was human."
That's it. That's what the story is about. It's not about people with amazing powers exploring strange worlds battling alien creatures . . . it's about Trank's man-boobs.
Trank and Kinberg thought it would be a really neat idea to make a film not about superheroes but about puberty. The transition and 'body horror' is an allegory for puberty and the military stands in for the parents and teachers who "just don't understand" (from the ignorant view of the kids - we adults understand much better than kids realize because we were there once).
It's a really dumb idea and this is a film geared towards kids, but that's the explanation.
Ah, the closer we get the better things sound!
Kate Mara is 32.
I'm a little curious, why did people latched onto the changes in this movie when numerous good movies have substantially changed the source material? Hasn't it been proven by now that, while faithfulness to the source material is not bad, it is not exactly mandatory to deliver an entertaining movie?
To be fair fanboys always complain about any changes made to the source material but if the film is good to them they shut up.I'm a little curious, why did people latched onto the changes in this movie when numerous good movies have substantially changed the source material? Hasn't it been proven by now that, while faithfulness to the source material is not bad, it is not exactly mandatory to deliver an entertaining movie?
It is the degree of the changes that is the problem. Yes, every comic book film makes changes, sometimes substantial changes. But this film has changed so much that it doesn't even appear to resemble the comics in any meaningful way whatsoever. Very few comic book films are not even recognizable in the way that this one is, and those few that are (ex. Catwoman, Dragon Ball: Evolution) get just as much criticism from the fans as this film has.
The changes aren't interesting to you, I know some people that have finally taken an interest to this material after passing up the book for years. As for bell, being the muscle is a state of mind; just like being confident, or being a bully or being a push over. As for unimaginative, simply copying source is also a form of lazy. Just saying.That's because those changes aren't even remotely interesting. Jamie Bell is not and never will be "the muscle." Doom being the fifth member of the Fantastic Four yet again is lazy and unimaginative writing.
It is interesting. Fox of all studios not giving away all the big action ala first class/spiderman/avengers in their marketing..Given that many were worried this film would be too "talky," how much action is actually in the film?
It is interesting. Fox of all studios not giving away all the big action ala first class/spiderman/avengers in their marketing..
I get why people wanting this to do good would be worried that fox isn't selling their big movie in the same way as the one with the hulk buster fight if you will, but to actually complain about things not being spoiled(for once)... in this day and age.
Between chronicle and the way fox makes their cbms, this movie having action seems like no brainer.
Well I hope you accept my apology on this matter then. It was late, I said something stupid, sorry.I'm not trying to stir anything up, but these comments give the impression that you two don't truly understand the dynamics of an adoption family. I can tell you from personal experience that any family that has adopted children in it would be appalled at and offended by the notion that there's any difference between the relationships of biological children/siblings and adopted children/siblings.
My adopted siblings are as much a part of my family as my biological siblings, and their relationships with me and my parents are just as strong and meaningful as the relationships that my biological siblings have with me and my parents.
Just a reminder to everyone to take this dony guys reports with a grain of salt. We have no confirmation of any screenings I'm Israel, we know he's wrong about the embargo, and he's way off on the films run time.
Just a reminder to everyone to take this dony guys reports with a grain of salt. We have no confirmation of any screenings I'm Israel, we know he's wrong about the embargo, and he's way off on the films run time.