samsnee
Ok
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2006
- Messages
- 23,489
- Reaction score
- 16,768
- Points
- 103
Wow how shocking. What a babyI believe it.
Wow how shocking. What a babyI believe it.
WTF does this have to do with anyone's second amendment?Sounds like a dog whistle telling his cult to take matters into their own hands. He’s telling Americans to kill other Americans and Republicans in Congress either agree or ignore it.
View attachment 34680
Is it a dog whistle if he just says it?Sounds like a dog whistle telling his cult to take matters into their own hands. He’s telling Americans to kill other Americans and Republicans in Congress either agree or ignore it.
View attachment 34680
I noticed this as well. It didn't make sense...unless like you said he's calling out people to shoot looters.That 2A shoutout was conspicuous for its utter irrelevance to the sentence. How does rioting or looting affect anyone's right to own a gun?
Not hard to see some gun happy idiots seeing that as a green light from their orange god.
You know that is what he wants.I noticed this as well. It didn't make sense...unless like you said he's calling out people to shoot looters.![]()
WTF does this have to do with anyone's second amendment?
He is just calling out the dog by name at this point.Is it a dog whistle if he just says it?
One has nothing to do with the other. For two hundred years, the courts interpreted the second amendment as simply being related to militias and had no bearing on the private ownership of firearms for unrelated purposes. Limits on gun ownership were considered to be constitutional well into the 20th Century. Then the NRA came along and their judicial stooges stooges made up bull**** arguments in the mid-20th Century to turn the Second Amendment into what we know today.I'm not a constitutional scholar, but what the hell does a bunch of right wing idiots or, for that matter, some well meaning citizens being able to own firearms, have to do with a well regulated militia? I think the issue of citizens owning firearms is completely divorced from the 2nd amendment.
One has nothing to do with the other. For two hundred years, the courts interpreted the second amendment as simply being related to militias and had no bearing on the private ownership of firearms for unrelated purposes. Limits on gun ownership were considered to be constitutional well into the 20th Century. Then the NRA came along and their judicial stooges stooges made up bull**** arguments in the mid-20th Century to turn the Second Amendment into what we know today.