Matt said:Where are the passengers now? The island on Lost?
TheSumOfGod said:The "official" explanation completely disregards any and all evidence that contradicts it, and it contains many physical impossibilities. You just don't like MY explanation because it puts the blame on your oh-so-wonderful Bush administration/military-industrial complex.
Matt said:Just out of curiousity Lazur...if it wasn't shot down, doesn't it concern you quite a bit that President Bush knowingly allowed flight 93 to fly under the control of terrorists for 50 minutes with no interception?
Carter said:He does want them to be true.
He's ****ing insane.
Carter said:I thought I was already on ignore.
But you'll read everything I say anyway
Everybody wave to TSOG!!
Matt said:And your explanation completely disregards any and all evidence that supports the official story. You don't like the official story because you NEED these conspiracy theories. I'm not sure if you believe them or simply WANT them to be true.
Matt said:You know Carter, TSOG did not disrespect you in anyway. I have no problem at all calling him out when he is acting like an ass...but right now, he isn't...but you sure as hell are.
Carter said:I'm sick of his insanity and holier than thou attitude
TheSumOfGod said:That's not true, merely false assumptions on your part. If my own personal research would have lead me to believe that the "official" explanation of the story was the truth, then I would simply have accepted it as being so. But no, there is an overwhelming amount of contradicting evidence, that clearly points in the direction of many conspiracy theories being more credible than that absolute bulls**t the American government has tried to make us swallow...
Matt said:To be perfectly fair TSOG has been trying to be more considerate of other people's opinion. Furthermore, you cannot preach about a holier than thou attitude with the way you are treating him.
The Question said:Not really. The arguements I've heard for the consperacy theories, while good, aren't completely compelling. The best one I've heard is the fact that jet fuel wouldn't burn hot enough to melt metal. This is true. But, it would burn hot enough to weaken the metal. And the jest fuel plus the fact that an 80 ton jet smashed into the building would probably have weakened the structre enough for it to colapse.
Carter said:I can preach whatever I want.
The facts are there, but this assclown completely disregards them and acts like he knows more than everybody else
Matt said:However, he was speaking in context of an attack. It could entirely be possible to make that slip up. He never said the terrorists shot it down either...he simply said shot down when he clearly meant to say crashed. Whether it did crash or not, that is obviously what he intended to say.
Just out of curiousity Lazur...if it wasn't shot down, doesn't it concern you quite a bit that President Bush knowingly allowed flight 93 to fly under the control of terrorists for 50 minutes with no interception?
Matt said:Quit being an insulting, condesending prick or I'm reporting you to Daisy. Argue all you want, calling him an assclown and idiot isn't necessary. Whatever TSOG believes and however much I may disagree with it, he is clearly an intelligent man.
Matt said:Quit being an insulting, condesending prick or I'm reporting you to Daisy. Argue all you want, calling him an assclown and idiot isn't necessary. Whatever TSOG believes and however much I may disagree with it, he is clearly an intelligent man.
FlameHead said:I said Neither because I'm not entirely sure what the hell happened that day. Of the other two choices, I would say shot down. It's the only way to explain why there was nothing left to the plane, no sign of it even.
Because of such organizations like the 911 Truth Movement (http://www.911truth.org/) I've come to look at that day much differently than I once did. The questions that people are now asking are very vaild and because of all the secrecy, I truly am starting to believe a conspiracy theory as wild as this day being an inside job. A wound on themselves to perpetrate a war. It's not the first time in history that a government has done this, if this is what truly happened.
Either way, I, just don't know...
lazur said:I don't think Bush or anyone else knew for certain what was going on with that flight until it was too late. The only people who knew for certain were those who received the 911 calls and the families of passengers who called them. It wasn't in the air for that long.
I do, however, think a viable option would have been to shoot it down if it presented a threat. I just don't think the situation had escalated to that level at that point in time.