- Joined
- Apr 29, 2004
- Messages
- 75,011
- Reaction score
- 9,476
- Points
- 218
<<< has never had chicken pox
<<< has never had chicken pox
Out of curiosity, what lighthouse is that in your avatar?I'm doubting she was ever sick in the first place.
Your knowledge of neurology must be immense. I mean, the doctors diagnosed her as having dystonia, a very real neurological disorder, but what do they know? They should have asked you first, in my opinion.I still don't believe for a second that this girl wasn't faking. You're perfectly normal when you walk backwards and run, but once you start walking...![]()
But he said he didn't believe the girl was faking it. And he said believe.Your knowledge of neurology must be immense. I mean, the doctors diagnosed her as having dystonia, a very real neurological disorder, but what do they know? They should have asked you first, in my opinion.
That's still not faking, though. It also raises the question of how she was cured.It could easily have been psyhcosomatically induced dystonia and still be diagnosed.
1) A belief based on ignorance is still ignorant.But he said he didn't believe the girl was faking it. And he said believe.![]()
He DOESN'T believe that she WASN'T faking.I still don't believe for a second that this girl wasn't faking. You're perfectly normal when you walk backwards and run, but once you start walking...![]()
On the other hand, cheerleaders ARE athletes in their own right (in my opinion). She probably has a good level of endurance.I think that it would be exceptionally difficult to fake that disorder for any period of time longer than 40 minutes. Go ahead. Try to do it all day today. You can run and walk backward but you can't walk or sit still without freaking out.
But to say that you believe something isn't necessarily saying that it is going to be fact. There is a difference between saying that you don't believe someone and saying that you know they are faking isn't there? One is implying an opinion and the other is stating a fact.1) A belief based on ignorance is still ignorant.
None of this refutes my original point: a belief based on ignorance is still ignorant. I never made any claim with respect to the factual basis of his belief. I just found it amusing that because he was ignorant of the condition itself, his opinion was that she must be faking.But to say that you believe something isn't necessarily saying that it is going to be fact. There is a difference between saying that you don't believe someone and saying that you know they are faking isn't there? One is implying an opinion and the other is stating a fact.
Which part of that post was condescending? I never implied superiority to you, nor did I behave as though I were consciously descending from some superior rank or position. That's the definition of condescending. I merely made a statement of my own proficiency.katie_girl09 said:Seriously though, we know you're smart. But do you have to be condescending?
None of this refutes my original point: a belief based on ignorance is still ignorant. I never made any claim with respect to the factual basis of his belief. I just found it amusing that because he was ignorant of the condition itself, his opinion was that she must be faking.
Which part of that post was condescending? I never implied superiority to you, nor did I behave as though I were consciously descending from some superior rank or position. That's the definition of condescending. I merely made a statement of my own proficiency.
In other words, stop being so damn sensitive.![]()