Sequels Forget Routh! Bring back Dean Cain!

I believe that was the episode in which Lois and Lex Luthor get engaged. Superman was stalking Lois outside her windown then ran off into the middle of nowhere and screamed like a *****. Looks like Bryan Singer was also ripping-off this show. ;)
 
There was not one inch of originality in Superman Returns!
 
DvilDog said:
The kid was original wasnt it? :)

Sort of. Lois & Clark ended with someone leaving a kid on their front door.
 
Catman said:
I would love to see that. lol. Even if its in the form of an MTV Movie Award sketch. lol.

It's official me and you should write the Superman sequel.
 
Cain was not a great suerman, but his clark Kent was the best. and considering cain was suppose to play superman as the disguise, that is pefectly understandable.
 
Eros said:
Cain was not a great suerman, but his clark Kent was the best. and considering cain was suppose to play superman as the disguise, that is pefectly understandable.

Finally, somebody gets it around here. Clark Kent came first in L&C!
 
I thought it was common knowledge. The show is called Lois & Clark
 
Catman said:
I thought it was common knowledge. The show is called Lois & Clark

You would think so, but alot of people around here seem to not understand that concept.
 
venom420 said:
Finally, somebody gets it around here. Clark Kent came first in L&C!

Which is why Cain's portrayal came off as totally unbelieveable and dumb.

CK needs to be the disguise for live action portrayals.

It just isnt believeable the other way around.
 
I liked it either way. It's a show about Lois & Clark not Superman...you know?
 
Brainiac 2009 said:
Which is why Cain's portrayal came off as totally unbelieveable and dumb.

CK needs to be the disguise for live action portrayals.

It just isnt believeable the other way around.

Thats the boring route. With good writing, it's better to have CK as the real man, Superman as the disguise.
 
Actually...Kal-El is the real person. Clark Kent and Superman are simply two aspects of his personality.
 
Catman said:
Actually...Kal-El is the real person. Clark Kent and Superman are simply two aspects of his personality.

How so? He was raised as Clark for 25ish years. That would be his primary personality with Superman being an alter ego he uses. Kal-El would just be a name given to him by his folks, a kyrptonian personality wouldn't be imprinted because of that.
 
venom420 said:
Thats the boring route. With good writing, it's better to have CK as the real man, Superman as the disguise.

It just isnt physically possible unless you suspend all disbelief like in L+C.

I'm curious to see how you would write it to make it believeable though.


Then again the boringness of the CK disguise is relevant to how its written also.
 
thechubbysaint said:
How so? He was raised as Clark for 25ish years. That would be his primary personality with Superman being an alter ego he uses. Kal-El would just be a name given to him by his folks, a kyrptonian personality wouldn't be imprinted because of that.

Theres 2 Clarks though, the real man....and the disguise he uses in Metropolis to fool ppl.

Superman is the 3rd identity; his public one.
 
Catman said:
Saturday mornings?! :huh: Lois & Clark was an ABC primetime show.

in england... that would never be put on prime time in the UK:csad:
 
brandon-routh_small.jpg

updated-routh.jpg


If these changes are met for SR-Man of Steel...Cain is not even a conversacion. ...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"