GoldenAgeHero
Avenger
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2005
- Messages
- 12,337
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
i don't care. and whats the difference? besides widescreen and full screen. a better picture? crystal clarity?
Stewie Griffin said:Whats the difference? Quite a ****ing bit.
http://www.widescreen.org/examples/starwars/index.shtml

I'm different I'll take Widescreen if I have no choice. Those black lines are so @#$%ing annoying. Full screen all the way.SpeedballLives said:Fullscreen shouldn't even exist.
It's so f-ing pointless to even offer it.
If I ever get a film in Fullscreen as a gift, I ask the gift-giver for the reciept. I refuse to own fullscreen films.
That's why I support the original aspect ratio. If it was shot 1.37:1 then I want to see it that way. If it was shot 2.39:1 then I want to see it that way.Batattack said:They aren't that annoying. Just get over it and watch the movie the way it's meant to be seen.
Looks like you can't enjoy movies like Casablanca, Citizen Kane, The Maltese Falcon, and every Marx Brothers movie because it's not widescreenporchmonkey408 said:Widescreen. You suck if you enjoy fullscreen more. That is not an opinion. It is fact.
I feel dumb. I bought The Fountainhead on DVD a couple of days ago and was like "FULL SCREEN!? DAMNIT!"
...Yeah, its from 1948. Widescreen wasn't available to them yet.

Even though movies were fullscreen before The Robe and How to Marry a Millionairexwolverine2 said:fullscreen is for people who dont give a **** about movies