Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]266903[/split]
Quick question I have GTA4 for the 360, and I want to get liberty city for the PS3 cuz its cheaper...is there something similar like in Mass Effect when u beat the game it will effect the story in the sequel? If so than I'd rather get the 360 version...
Rumors are flying around that Rockstar will reveal GTA V at E3 and that it willl feature real world modern Los Angeles as the city. I really hope that is not the case. Rockstar has been slowly moving away from the more fun, cartoony, over the top aspects of the series ever since San Andreas. Putting it in the real world will be the final nail in the coffin of classic GTA, IMO.
At any rate, here is a link.
http://www.product-reviews.net/2011/06/05/gta-v-location-rumors-pre-e3-2011/
You loved the characters? All Niko does is whine about how bad his life is (as he continues to kill). He was so annoying. None of the other characters aside from Brucie and Packie were really memorable.
As for the complaint about putting it in the real world. Was there not a GTA set in London back when it was still 2-D?
He was better than a mute erran boy, a wanna be scarface and a boring hood rat
Whoa hold on, I though tommy vercetti was great as a chracter. The problem with SA and i suppose GTA IV (haven't actually played it), is that you have a character who is supposedly not inherently bad just put in tough situations but they go along committing mass murder and chaos with very little hesitance. At least with tommy he was like scarface he was psychotic he was an admitted bad guy, it was within reason for him to act like he did.
Either way with the groundbreaking work rockstar has done with RDR and LA Noire I can't see them go back to the old GTA template, would be a huge let down imo.
I'd like to see London done for the next game. Really not a fan of LA, at all.
IA. Niko was my favorite protagonist. I had no issues with himHe was better than a mute erran boy, a wanna be scarface and a boring hood rat
Whoa hold on, I though tommy vercetti was great as a chracter. The problem with SA and i suppose GTA IV (haven't actually played it), is that you have a character who is supposedly not inherently bad just put in tough situations but they go along committing mass murder and chaos with very little hesitance. At least with tommy he was like scarface he was psychotic he was an admitted bad guy, it was within reason for him to act like he did.
Either way with the groundbreaking work rockstar has done with RDR and LA Noire I can't see them go back to the old GTA template, would be a huge let down imo.
GTA should be silly, escapist fun.
Why?