Hank Pym?

Discussion in 'Avengers: Age of Ultron' started by Artistsean, Jul 21, 2013.

  1. Alex_Spider

    Alex_Spider Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,527
    Likes Received:
    0
    Spot on.:up: I don't get it why deviate so much from the mythos and neglect such a pivotal Avenger like Pym? They could easily introduce him as a new character and do so many interesting things with him, show the flawed side of his self, his bad temper with his wife and so many other things.

    It's enough that he wasn't a founding member of the team, but getting the short end of the stick in the sequel also? I call this EPIC FAIL. :down:
     
    #51
  2. Silvermoth

    Silvermoth Avenger

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2006
    Messages:
    14,086
    Likes Received:
    50
    I'm glad there's no Pym. There, I said it.
     
    #52
  3. TheLastAvenger

    TheLastAvenger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2011
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    0
    So?

    I don't mean to be dismissive, but you do realize that the excitement involvng the Avengers films has never been its comic book origins, right? It was just the best excuse to get the biggest superheroes Marvel still had the rights to on the screen together. S.H.I.E.L.D., Black Widow, Hawkeye...their only narrative purpose was to help facilitate these four entities interacting with one another. The fact that they existed within the Avengers comic book narrative was almost...beside the point, really.

    I say this because I have to wonder if fans have really deluded themselves into thinking that Hank Pym was ever going to be a primary member of the team. Let's say an Ant-Man movie never existed. Let's say Hank Pym and Janet Van Dyne were present from the first film onward, and perhaps even fought alongside the other Avengers. Do you really think they would have been fleshed out...like, at all? Of course not! They would have existed functioning in the same way Black Widow and Hawkeye did...as satellites orbiting the Big 4. Their story would be marginalized and brushed aside as soon as the big guns appeared together on screen.

    That's just the way it is. The Avengers movie franchise exists for a very different reason than the comic books existed. The only thing I really fault Whedon with is using Ultron at all. Fans are going to expect certain things, and without Hank Pym, he becomes Ultron in name only.

    But I totally get it. Whedon is a creator first, and a geek second. His geek side wants to see Ultron in his Avengers movie, but his creator side doesn't want to be beholden to the comics. "Ya, well, I can't make an Ultron character that meshes with the comic books? Then I'll make my own Ultron character, with blackjack and hookers!"

    Personally, I trust Whedon to at least make Ultron compelling, with or without Hank Pym. Maybe that's not enough for some people. So be it.
     
    #53
  4. Mr.M

    Mr.M Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,244
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah I thought Pym was supposed to be the Danny Ocean type character in a heist movie that Wright hinted at Ant-Man becoming. Lang would be the main guy, but Pym would be the sort of mentor. Maybe he was a relevant superhero in the 70's and 80's that had ties to the initial development of Ultron. Something like the Sentinels in X-Men where work on them began as early as the 70's as the new movie is laying out. I think Hank/Janet could work as older counterparts that don't necessarily anchor the Avengers in the modern day.
     
    #54
  5. Lord

    Lord All Mighty

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2011
    Messages:
    15,505
    Likes Received:
    0
    BLack widow? a satelite? She was one of the best developed characters in Avengers
     
    #55
  6. pr0xyt0xin

    pr0xyt0xin Shaper Savant

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2012
    Messages:
    7,162
    Likes Received:
    1
    When Sam and I agree you know something has gone terribly wrong...

    jk Sam. But seriously, agreed.
     
    #56
  7. OB12

    OB12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2010
    Messages:
    1,551
    Likes Received:
    0
    Totally agree here. I don't want the Avengers to fight just another killer robot and taking Pym out of the equation really kinda boils Ultron down to just that. Now Joss may tack some sort of origin on to Stark as the creator but that seems totally out of place given what we know of Stark. Just pretty disappointed with this news.
     
    #57
  8. Blake II

    Blake II Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2013
    Messages:
    213
    Likes Received:
    0
    I never knew who Hank Pym was so I have no problem with them changing Ultron's origin.

    As long as he gives the Avengers a hard ass fight, I'll be good.
     
    #58
  9. BoredGuy

    BoredGuy Chairman of the Bored

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    7,883
    Likes Received:
    4
    Yeah I was never a Pym fan either
    and as long as they can properly develop the drama with the character's that are there, i'll be happy.
    I could see Jarvis gaining sentience and flipping a **** at stark, leading to ultron being born.. or something like that
    guess it would take to much time to introduce Pym and properly develop his relationship to Ultron in one movie that has 10 other major characters.

    that said, I'm still pretty shocked about this news
    would've thought they'd hold off on ultron til part 3
     
    #59
  10. Mysteryman

    Mysteryman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    10,417
    Likes Received:
    3
    Has Pym been confimed as the main focus of the Ant Man movie?
     
    #60
  11. The Question

    The Question Objectivism doesn't work.

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2005
    Messages:
    40,519
    Likes Received:
    0
    Or, more likely, another character gets cast in the role of Frankenstein.
     
    #61
  12. Mr.M

    Mr.M Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,244
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, Pym is the predecessor replaced by the Scott Lang, who is the sort of protégé according to intitial reports of Wright's script.

    I think given that Hulk was so popular in Avengers, and given Banner's understanding of physics and what not, more so than a biologist from what I gather, it could be some Stark/Banner combo. Or most likely just Stark. But I think they want Hulk to have a prominent role. It's the Hulk. You cannot relegate that in favor of Giant-Man or some less popular Avenger from an individual standpoint. That's why Banner could fill that role. Then you incorporate Vision, SW, QS, and there is no room to add Janet/Hank and fans will complain about development issues.
     
    #62
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2013
  13. pr0xyt0xin

    pr0xyt0xin Shaper Savant

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2012
    Messages:
    7,162
    Likes Received:
    1
    its important to note that these initial reports were a long time ago.

    So I don't think it's safe to assume either way at this point. Could be Pym could be Lang.
     
    #63
  14. Mr.M

    Mr.M Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,244
    Likes Received:
    0
    From a cinematic standpoint, it fits. They want comedy, so the young guy/old guy dynamic could be in play. You need character dynamic to make comedy work; it's never just one guy in most successful comedies.

    Then add the element of that heist noir, and you generally have the older guy pulling the strings and mentoring the younger guy. So if these elements come into play, it makes sense from a creative standpoint. I don't think Wright would have removed his central character just to be amenable to the MCU. I don't think he would have signed on if he didn't hold that kind of creative power.
     
    #64
  15. Lord

    Lord All Mighty

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2011
    Messages:
    15,505
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm big Hank Pym fan either, that doesn't mean deleting him isn't a bad change :o
     
    #65
  16. pr0xyt0xin

    pr0xyt0xin Shaper Savant

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2012
    Messages:
    7,162
    Likes Received:
    1
    Eugh...

    I'm sorry, you've got a fine analysis there and you may very well be right. But it sounds bad to me.

    Like, Scott Lang showing up as Ant-Man in Phase 3 after Ultron is already (most probably) defeated. Thus Wasp not being likely as an Avenger alongside him because she is old. Unless they make her the young Lang's romance and not Pym. wut...??!

    It all seems so trite. Inane at best. None of that sounds like what Marvel has built up with Phase 1. It's all so far from the comics and makes me sad.

    Thus, I reiterate, "Eugh."
     
    #66
  17. Mr.M

    Mr.M Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,244
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wasp could be the Judi Dench of the series... :cwink: But nah, I don't see that happening (Janet being Lang's lover). Probably another love interest will be incorporated. But who, as of now, is filling that older, matriarchal role in the franchise? You just can't have bombshells for every female character.
    I'd like to see a seasoned, female lead for a change, possibly in PIII.

    An older Wasp also gives you material for a more flamboyant, 60's-70's style MCU movie, should they be saving characters for an adaptation in that time period. I'm not saying that's what Marvel is thinking though. But considering some of the cheesy abilities in play, it's worth a thought. No doubt Lang's character is going to be an updated take, and we'll see Matrix style action. But should they want to revisit some MCU backstory and fill the time between Cap: TFA and the modern MCU, Hank could fit right in there.
     
    #67
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2013
  18. Iowa

    Iowa Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2013
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    Still seems strange though , seemed like a good time to introduce Hank Pym , even if he's nothing more then a scientist

    They really got me curious now as to what their going to do with Ant-Man
     
    #68
  19. Pink Ranger

    Pink Ranger Happy Mothers' Day

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2004
    Messages:
    33,095
    Likes Received:
    19
    I kind of dig the idea of Hank and Janet as superheroes from the 1960s. However, supposing that we want them to be contemporary characters, why not the following:

    Have Hank Pym be introduced in Avengers 2 as the antagonist. Kind of a villain, but not quite: he's not evil, but a misguided, idealistic scientist whose creation gets out of control. And because he sentimentally thinks of his creation as a unique, living being, he actively works agains the Avengers to protect his child.

    At the end of the movie, he realizes his mistake. He "betrays" his creation, which leads to the utter hatred his creation will now have for him. Stark, Banner and Rogers see Pym in his prison cell, and reason that Pym could do a lot more good as an ally rather than as an inmate. Then AntMan, in whatever incarnation, can stem from that story.

    This helps establish Hank as the morally compromised superhero, without having him have to punch Janet. That won't work in today's political climate, no way.
     
    #69
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2013
  20. Alex_Spider

    Alex_Spider Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,527
    Likes Received:
    0
    And that's the writer's and director's fault for giving more screen time on cheesy one liners and a kiddie storyline. "Oh, how cool a random shield agent dressed in an expensive suit with a tie, forced in our throats and becoming a hero like the Avengers instead of replacing him with pivotal characters that founded the Avengers. He is so badass that he gets to shoot with an alien pistol too before he dies heroically" :whatever:

    That's why I didn't care for this movie. It was all cool cgi effects and predictable dialogue while pissing off on Hank and Janet's legacy. And hated how the shield agents were wearing ordinary collar suits. I think it lacked magic and comic book nostalgia.
     
    #70
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2013
  21. DarthSkywalker

    DarthSkywalker May the Force Be With You

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Messages:
    86,079
    Likes Received:
    87
    Did someone just actually complain about Coulson? Like, in real life? :huh:
     
    #71
  22. Kahran Ramsus

    Kahran Ramsus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2003
    Messages:
    11,345
    Likes Received:
    20
    Losing Janet would hurt, but there are practical reasons for not using her. Of the core Avengers her powers are by far the most difficult/expensive to do in live action.
     
    #72
  23. DarthSkywalker

    DarthSkywalker May the Force Be With You

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Messages:
    86,079
    Likes Received:
    87
    Considering they are doing an Ant-Man film, I don't tihnk that is a fair argument.
     
    #73
  24. Kahran Ramsus

    Kahran Ramsus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2003
    Messages:
    11,345
    Likes Received:
    20
    They are, but that's not an ensemble like Avengers so they don't have to worry about all the other characters. Even saying that I have more concerns about Ant-Man than any other Marvel film, including Guardians of the Galaxy. We'll see.

    Edit: Plus they could presumably simplify things in an Ant-Man solo. He doesn't need to fly around and fight a bunch of aliens/robots/alien-robots like he would in an Avengers film.
     
    #74
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2013
  25. DarthSkywalker

    DarthSkywalker May the Force Be With You

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Messages:
    86,079
    Likes Received:
    87
    Why? Edgar Wright is making it. :yay:
     
    #75

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"