Greens
I am Danny DeVito
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2011
- Messages
- 16,459
- Reaction score
- 804
- Points
- 103
I actually didn't mind Sabotage. It was kinda fun to watch.
I didn't hate it, either.
It was worth it for the 48% body fat scene.
I actually didn't mind Sabotage. It was kinda fun to watch.
Ayer basically admitted to making Sabotage for a quick buck. Also, he had to work with a script written by our friend Skip Woods of Wolverine Origins and Die Hard 5 fame.
I didn't hate it, either.
It was worth it for the 48% body fat scene.
From the sound of it, he made the Suicide Squad for a quick buck as well. Who exactly agrees to 6 weeks to write a script if they are serious about a project?Ayer basically admitted to making Sabotage for a quick buck. Also, he had to work with a script written by our friend Skip Woods of Wolverine Origins and Die Hard 5 fame.
From the sound of it, he made the Suicide Squad for a quick buck as well. Who exactly agrees to 6 weeks to write a script if they are serious about a project?
Which is fine. But then I don't buy that he was super serious about this project either. Abrams fought for time over TFA. Extended his window by over 6 months.Someone who desperately wants in on the action. This was his chance to land a DC project and he took it.
Someone who desperately wants in on the action. This was his chance to land a DC project and he took it.
Which is fine. But then I don't buy that he was super serious about this project either. Abrams fought for time over TFA. Extended his window by over 6 months.
I didn't say he didn't care. I am saying he clearly wasn't worried about getting his vision on screen to an amount that mattered. What happened to integrity?WB obviously didn't have 6 months to spare. Nobody knows what went on there, but to say that Ayer didn't care is jumping to conclusions.
From the sound of it, he made the Suicide Squad for a quick buck as well. Who exactly agrees to 6 weeks to write a script if they are serious about a project?
This movie was interfered with from the start. This has been mentioned in articles release over the last couple of days. This wasn't just reactionary to BvS. They were testing the film and trailers for a while, and they already had different versions from the jump. Ayer clearly knew he didn't have final cut. Again, he was okay with this.And he's a fast writer. I don't really think that's exactly the problem. Worrying about another movie's reception ("Batman V Superman") and trying to pander to the on-line critics and folks is what can break a movie. You gotta let a movie be what it is. If David Ayer's vision had a dark and somber tone, well, that's what they should've went with.
I didn't say he didn't care. I am saying he clearly wasn't worried about getting his vision on screen to an amount that mattered. What happened to integrity?
This movie was interfered with from the start. This has been mentioned in articles release over the last couple of days. This wasn't just reactionary to BvS. They were testing the film and trailers for a while, and they already had different versions from the jump. Ayer clearly knew he didn't have final cut. Again, he was okay with this.
He was going to overcome 6 weeks of writing and signing away final cut... okay. Well if you want to believe that, that is up to you.Maybe he thought he could overcome the restrictions?
He was going to overcome 6 weeks of writing and signing away final cut... okay. Well if you want to believe that, that is up to you.
And he's a fast writer. I don't really think that's exactly the problem. Worrying about another movie's reception ("Batman V Superman") and trying to pander to the on-line critics and folks is what can break a movie. You gotta let a movie be what it is. If David Ayer's vision had a dark and somber tone, well, that's what they should've went with.
Do you know why this tension exist? Because he signed away final cut and agreed to what WB wanted from the start. Do you think Nolan signed away final cut for TDK or TDKR? For Inception? That JJ Abrams was like, "well I know you have been courting me for over a year LF, but I yeah, you can have final cut on TFA".Who says he was okay with this? The articles clearly talk about there being tension between him and the studio. Who tells you he didn't fight for his vision? It's just that, at the end of the day, Warners are still the ones owning the movie, so he can fight as much as he wants, but if they say "no" it's "no". And at that point he can either collaborate to try and find common ground, or walk and leave it completely in their hands.
On what? I don't know how good the movie is yet, but this is certainly not Ayer's movie, and he was apparently willing to sign away that right from the start. If not he couldn't be locked out of the editing room for a bunch of trailer people.I'm just speculating. It sounds like you've already made up your mind.
Nolan really got the deal of a lifetime when it came to TDKS. Getting final cut when he had no big smash hits under his belt? Crazy
From the sound of it, he made the Suicide Squad for a quick buck as well. Who exactly agrees to 6 weeks to write a script if they are serious about a project?
I don't think he had final cut on Begins. But he made such a good film that had great legs, and killed it on home media, he got final cut on TDK. Also Nolan always wins brownie points for finishing on time and coming in under budget like every time. He is a studio's dream.Nolan really got the deal of a lifetime when it came to TDKS. Getting final cut when he had no big smash hits under his belt? Crazy
Ayer basically admitted to making Sabotage for a quick buck. Also, he had to work with a script written by our friend Skip Woods of Wolverine Origins and Die Hard 5 fame.