Dr. Fate
Avenger
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2005
- Messages
- 12,736
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
New Line didn't have the distribution rights I believe. They've been fighting for them for a while now.SpeedballLives said:Wesyeed, your Avvy scares me.
Why do you have HER in your avvy?
Back on topic. Why didn't he just make this first?
Although in continuity with each other, The Hobbit is separate from the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Having rights to one doesn't mean you have rights to the other.SpeedballLives said:How do you not have...
When you have the rights to...
Boom said:The Dark Knight, Halo, and The Hobbit all in the same year? I don't know if I could take it.
Boom said:Dear God, I hope this is true. If the movie begins Production in July 2007, then it'd be ready by Winter 2008, five years after Lord of the Rings.
2008. Can you IMAGINE what Gollum would look like? Or better yet, Smaug? Holy. ****.
The Dark Knight, Halo, and The Hobbit all in the same year? I don't know if I could take it.
Dr. Fate said:A Hobbit film would give the summer or holiday season a much needed shot in the arm.
The_Vision said:They've got to get back Ian Mckellen, Ian Holme, Andy Serkis and Hugo Weaving. Also maybe Liv Tyler, Orlando Bloom and John Rhys-Davies can feature as cameos.
My bad.hippie_hunter said:2008 is actually shaping up to be rather good to the point that it doesn't need a shot in the arm.
The Dark Knight
Iron Man
Wolverine
James Bond 22
Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince
the Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian
The Incredible Hulk
Halo
Sin City 3: Hell and Back
Indiana Jones 4
Avatar
There's still money to be wrung from it either way.Avalanche said:It's been a while since I read the hobbit, but I seem to remember it being a little more fantasy based than the LotR trilogy.
I can't wait to see this up on the big screen, though weren't they avoiding it because they felt the story was too winding for a movie. They thought it could be better served by a TV series type format.