I meant the whole movie set in Arkham. After the ëpic "Batman film, this would be the "claustrophobic"one.We already got Arkham in Begins. Or did you mean more action in it for B3?
It didn't hurt the first Die Hard too much, even in terms of action. A few years ago I would have smoked your avvy, but I quit smoking avvys.How can you have an entire movie set in Arkham? That would severely limit it, don't you think?
I didn't mean an exact repeat of Die Hard, but maybe set like one act of the film in Arkham, that would be a cool way to feature some of the best villains, a bit like with Bruce Lee and the game of death.Thanks, I just found it. It called to me.
But I'm not sure the way Die Hard worked would translate well to Batman. Die Hard was a hostage situation. I'm thinking Batman could've handled things a lot better than John Mcclane could've. I just think a hostage movie like that would get pretty boring if it involved Batman.
How can you have an entire movie set in Arkham? That would severely limit it, don't you think?
I just think a hostage movie like that would get pretty boring if it involved Batman.
I didn't mean an exact repeat of Die Hard, but maybe set like one act of the film in Arkham, that would be a cool way to feature some of the best villains, a bit like with Bruce Lee and the game of death....It would be a more horror oriented take on Batman.
unless the hostage was Alicia Keyes
I'm glad you like it.^ hah. yes
unless the hostage was Alicia Keyes
this is a good idea
I miss John Belushi, he could have been a cool Penguin.
