Kmack
Cheers!
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2003
- Messages
- 25,860
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Hear hear!I'd take Raimi's Vulture story over his forced Venom story any day.

Hear hear!I'd take Raimi's Vulture story over his forced Venom story any day.
Actually it was stated in the book that the reason the vulture story really got dropped was because they couldnt find a way to really tie the vulture to peter parker without making a movie with just the vulture and thats not what they were aiming to do.
Agreed.....Sam telling the story he ultimately wanted to tell would have made a;l the difference in the world. And at this point given that we got Venom, there is nothing to compare whether which villain would have been better suited action wise. Venom certainly got to whupp up on Spidey and the time he got was entertaining to say the least, but whether or not the type of Vulture they would have used and how he would have been portrayed is still a mystery. So I can't say one way or the other.I'm torn because Vulture is such a lame villain but Brock/Venom was so under utilized by Raimi. I think the theme of revenge works better with Venom but I was so disappointed by the lack of screentime with Brock. Ultimately, I would have just liked it if Raimi was allowed to use whichever characters he felt was best to tell his story, instead of receiving interference by the producers.
Why would it not make sense? Spiderman could have easily ruined Toomes's life as well building hatred in prison among other things. Revenge is revenge it works either way.That makes sense. The Vulture plot seemed like kind of a stretch; it's hard to believe Adrian Toomes would bear that much hatred towards Spiderman (whereas it makes sense for Brock to be so hateful considering how Peter ruined his life). It's also good to know that Raimi wasn't really "forced" into using Venom, and that he preferred it to his original script.
And honestly, I don't know why people are wishing Raimi had used the Vulture in the first place if he and Venom end up achieving the same purpose in the movie.
Avi Arad was not willing to wait and be patient. They could have made lots of money on this movie and still had a diamond in Venom waiting down the line. With Lizard and Venom on the horizon there would be no doubt where they go from here. But.........oh wellYou would think the studio would of saved Venom as there ace card for when Raimi leaved the franchise.
You would think the studio would of saved Venom as there ace card for when Raimi leaved the franchise.
After both the venom and vulture scripts were completed the studio as a whole agreed that the venom story was better for what they were wanting to do in spidey 3. Actually it was stated in the book that the reason the vulture story really got dropped was because they couldnt find a way to really tie the vulture to peter parker without making a movie with just the vulture and thats not what they were aiming to do. So in the end while sam and crew thought both scripts were great everyone agreed the venom script was the best way to go.
Avi Arad was not willing to wait and be patient. They could have made lots of money on this movie and still had a diamond in Venom waiting down the line. With Lizard and Venom on the horizon there would be no doubt where they go from here. But.........oh well
Yea, I forgot, everyone and their grandma must be connected to Peter Parker in some way in Raimi's Spider-Man films.![]()
Green Goblin 2, Symbiote, Venom at the end would've been aces.![]()
Why? Who knows. but perhaps they would have written a good enough reason within the story as to the bitterness toward Spiderman. I still think Sandman would have been the main villain and Vulture would have met an ugly demise at the end because of his relentless revenge.My question is why would the character of Vulture hate Spiderman so much in Sp3?
Yes exactly. The plan was always for that second big villain to die in the last battle. They just picked the vulture first. Sandman was always going to be the main villain with harry still becoming the goblin. It was later when they chose to use venom because they thought the venom script was better and venom brought more interesting ideas to the plate that the vulture didnt.Why? Who knows. but perhaps they would have written a good enough reason within the story as to the bitterness toward Spiderman. I still think Sandman would have been the main villain and Vulture would have met an ugly demise at the end because of his relentless revenge.
I hate The Vulture as much as I hate Mysterio.![]()
Vulture would have rocked, but Venom was so great!
Am I the only one that thinks they should have never went with the Sandman?
Yeah, I'm glad they went with Venom instead...
I had high hopes for Sandman, like "Cool, he's one of the more difficult foes. A guy made of sand. Kickin!" Until I saw the movie and found he was more so Sadman.
A great villain, done not-so-great.