Cobblepot said:But I do think that he'll develope a counsiens (sp?) in this trilogy and not let Two-Face or The Joker die, but save them at any cost.
Malone said:However, at the end of the movie, he left Ra's Al Ghul to die on the train. Would Batman ever leave anybody to die? How was that justified?
It's late. Going with this seems convenient. . . yet oddly prudent.ChrisBaleBatman said:C'mon. I don't see a way he could have saved Ra's. He needs both hands to stiffen the cape and glide out of there, and I'd LOVE to see him die shooting his grapling hook out of a speeding train probably breaking his neck. Although, he probably could have jumped out......and then shot the hook, but then wouldn't the hook possible hit nothing really b/c of the amount of space around him? I dunno.
See.....not as simple.
That was the point. Nolan established Batman as a different kind of hero in that moment. In that moment it should have been clear to the audience that Batman is not a saviour like Superman. He is a man with demons and his own style of justice.I SEE SPIDEY said:I wouldn't call Bats a muderer or anything and the scene didn't ruin the movie, it's just that I find it to be a questionable thing for Batman to do.
7Hells said:That was the point. Nolan established Batman as a different kind of hero in that moment. In that moment it should have been clear to the audience that Batman is not a saviour like Superman. He is a man with demons and his own style of justice.
Comic book wise, this is Batman in the beginning and in the beginning Batman killed.