M
Mjölnir
Guest
But thats my point. For Hulk always some excuses. He never won. He never won Fenris, Thor in first Avenger movie, in Ragnarok...
And ok but fact is that this is not rule fights (boxing, ufc) this is all dirty fight and by this Hulk to me won in Ragnarok. Also, Hulkbuster won in Avengers 2 but you all hypocritical because you do not talking about how Hulk cam down when he see people (Hulkbuster vs Hulk) but you talking about Obedience Disk and Grandmaster.
This is same. For you Hulkbuster won but Hulk no won vs Thor in Ragnarok. How so? It's same fight with cheat shots. Think about it. Before Hulk KO in Avengers 2, he has endured hundreds of blows by Hulkbuster, laser beam, building and then he KO by one little punch. No logic. Well, if you're analyzing then you see how Hulk calming down when see people.
And you never speak about that. I'm sure if anyone asks you who won Hulkbuster or Hulk that your answer is Hulkbuster but when talking about Thor vs Hulk, then for Thor (Thor is Hulk in this case from Hulkbuster Hulk) then you always mention Grandmaster and Obedience Disc (equivalent Hulk si calming down).
At least be consistent. So, to me Hulkbuster won. Yes, it's cheap KO because HBulk calming down. Also, Hulk won vs Thor, specially vs regular Thor then with help of Grandmaster he KO Thor. So, Hulk won.
Even if you do not acept this, you can not talk how Thor is cleary won. How that? Hulk standing and then Grandmaster...
Well, Hulk is fun to watch in Ragnarok (i love movie and Thor. Really something special). But honestly it's not great. To me Hulk in first Avenger is great. I want i see something like Hulk vs Leviathan. That one punch it's crazy.
And we do't see antyhing like this. Imagine that Thor get punch like this? I mean, Hulk punches Thor but it's cleary that power of this pucnhes it's not the same like punch versus Leviathan.
There's almost always a non-finish or a mitigating factor when it comes to hero vs hero fights. Thor didn't beat Iron Man before they got interrupted, Hulk was calming down when he got KO'ed by the Hulkbuster, etc.
If you want to call it a win then you have to say that The Grandmaster and Hulk beat Thor. Hulk couldn't beat him alone and was getting beaten up before the Grandmaster stepped in.
I've always said that Hulk was calming down in AoU since the film came out, which likely helped him getting knocked out, and now you accuse me of being hypocritical and never having said that? That's both disrespectful and ignorant on your part.
I haven't said that Thor won in Ragnarok either, I've said that he was clearly winning when the fight was interrupted by the Grandmaster.
So I'm perfectly consistent. You on the other hand are being inconsistent in both complaining about people calling the Hulkbuster a win and at the same time accepting that logic. Pick one stance and go with it.
Well, Hulk is fun to watch in Ragnarok (i love movie and Thor. Really something special). But honestly it's not great. To me Hulk in first Avenger is great. I want i see something like Hulk vs Leviathan. That one punch it's crazy.
And we do't see antyhing like this. Imagine that Thor get punch like this? I mean, Hulk punches Thor but it's cleary that power of this pucnhes it's not the same like punch versus Leviathan.
Hulk is great in Ragnarok. There's so much character to him there and he's certainly incredibly strong.
He's hit Thor and other things just as hard. It's not Hulk's punch that does the most damage to the Leviathan, it's the Leviathan's weight and momentum that crushes itself against Hulk's fist when he's holding ground. It's holding his ground that's the real strength feat there, not the punch.