Ultimate_Superman
Avenger
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2004
- Messages
- 11,994
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
True but some rules can not be broken mainly how involve Lois and Clark can really be.
I agree in theory. The "rules" should be mythos-based and not Warner limitations. If you recall, when Lois was first brought onto the show, she wasn't allowed to meet Lex or kiss Clark, even in a dream sequence. They were adamant about that.True but some rules can not be broken mainly how involve Lois and Clark can really be.
True but some rules are because of McG movie and some rules come because of the one we have now so its all a matter of figuring out which rules go to which.I agree in theory. The "rules" should be mythos-based and not Warner limitations. If you recall, when Lois was first brought onto the show, she wasn't allowed to meet Lex or kiss Clark, even in a dream sequence. They were adamant about that.
Yeah, well...
![]()
There were other restrictions with Lois too, particularly with her involvement at the DP. That will be changing as well come next season.
In another example, I remember reading DeKnight's comments on his blog about how they weren't allowed to have Jimmy Olsen on the show. Then BAM! The following week, Ashmore was announced as having been cast. I guess the point here is, there's no sense in debating what they say because the facts change on practically a daily basis.
If you could design the Smallville version of the Superman costume?
What would it kook like? Would you keep it classic or go you own way?
lol that looks horribleTo be honest I would use McG Superman outfit which IMO is pretty nice.
![]()
![]()
I'd stick with the CLASSIC. Because in the end nothing beats The red cape & boots and Blue tights .
![]()
![]()
i agree with you on everything below what i put in bold, but that in bold confuses me
you say that the ST suit is classic, then you say that "Classic costume" is Superman, any redesign to make it "cool' is ridiculous. i am just confused with you statement becaues isnt that what they did with SR, its like they said hey, lets make it darker so its cooler and not so childish or goofy, and the symbol is kinda big so make it smaller, we could also make the material kinda cool and high tech, so its not so halloween costume home-made looking...
please,i am not arguing, and im certainly not trying to bash SR either, sure it could have been better, but i liked it a lot, and i love anything Superman, i just was confused by your statement![]()
![]()
Well to be fair the only thing about the outfit SR changed was the \S/ on the boots. I mean during the mid 40's Superman would sometimes have an \S/ on his belt as well but not shaped like the one SR did. But really if people want the classic outfit you are looking at Action Comics #1 outfit same if you want the classic Superman. What we have is the updated Superman outfit but the classic Superman outfit will always be the one shown in Action Comics #1.IMO, the SR costume is a classic Superman costume. Yeah, some idiot fashion designer put there stupid spin on the costume... but it is still essentially, in all it's elements, a classic superman costume. It is still blue, it still has red boots, trunks and cape. The only real things they changed (if you can call it that) is the way that cape fits, the belt, and the shape of the trunks. The colour changes (the darkening) was inevitable, but remember that the colours were also adjusted in Lois and Clark (vs. STM)
yet, it is STILL and classic costume. Minor adjustments in the fit, and cut of the costume is pretty much irrelevant, because again, in the end, the costume ends up a classic costume. It's like comparing the Byrne Costume in the comics vs. Alex Ross's Costume in his comics. They are slightly different, yet, still obviously the classic costume. A more relevant live action comparision would be STM vs. Lois and Clark vs. SR. All the costumes are different, and have different cuts. The Capes are all attached differently, and the trunks are all different, yet they are all still classic Superman Costumes.
things I'm more concerned about are fans who want a full redesign or major changes to the costume.
you forget the belt buckle, the neckline, and most of all, the colors.Well to be fair the only thing about the outfit SR changed was the \S/ on the boots.
Superman never had a full blown emblem on his classic suit in the 40s... The only one that I know that exists from that time period is a painting that was done.I mean during the mid 40's Superman would sometimes have an \S/ on his belt as well but not shaped like the one SR did.
actually, the classic look was established in the early/mid 50'sBut really if people want the classic outfit you are looking at Action Comics #1 outfit same if you want the classic Superman. What we have is the updated Superman outfit but the classic Superman out with will always be the one shown in Action Comics #1.
agai nfor the 1348347893943849839 tims.you forget the belt buckle, the neckline, and most of all, the colors.
Superman never had a full blown emblem on his classic suit in the 40s... The only one that I know that exists from that time period is a painting that was done.
actually, the classic look was established in the early/mid 50's
and I have to disagree with ya superfreak... the McG suit may be different in design, but it kicks so much more ass than the crap that we saw in SR.
well those are details my friend. you moved the slider in photoshop for 5 numers i guss.
i am still wating for a pic of an amateur suit so that i can see how the comicbook suit would look in real life. or at least a photorealistic manip.that's still a bit too dark even for me... this is more acceptable:
but this is beyond the point. Make it more like what we see in the comic books, and it'll be just fine.
you forget the belt buckle, the neckline, and most of all, the colors.
Superman never had a full blown emblem on his classic suit in the 40s... The only one that I know that exists from that time period is a painting that was done.
actually, the classic look was established in the early/mid 50's
and I have to disagree with ya superfreak... the McG suit may be different in design, but it kicks so much more ass than the crap that we saw in SR.
3 examples... all you've already seen before.i am still wating for a pic of an amateur suit so that i can see how the comicbook suit would look in real life. or at least a photorealistic manip.
waiting.
I can respect that, even though I disagree with it.Superfreak said:I disagree with you. The SR costume was a good adaptation of the classic costume. I'm not saying it was perfect (I dislike the belt and the fit of the trunks), but it is still essentially a classic costume. And as All Star pointed out, there have been variations on the costume since Action Comics 1... but the core of the costume has remained the same.
The costume you are advocating is fundamentally different from the Classic Superman Costume. It is more a costume 'inspired by' superman, rather than being THE actual superman costume. Maybe it's because I'm a conservative fan... or maybe it's for the reasons I mentioned earlier: That the superman costume is not supposed to be some super-cool space aged design with red shoulders and no trunks. It's not supposed to be cool at all. That's what the rest of the DC superheros are for.
Superman's costume should always be of the Classic design. The core of the costume should never be stylistically redesigned. It should always be blue spandex (or a modern equivalent of that), with red boots, trunks and Cape, and the shield on the front.
SR's redesign of the Classic Costume was a bit of a stretch, but it turned out alright. But I would definately not go any further than what they did in the movie:
The MCG costume, is a costume inspired by superman, but it is not a superman costume. Just like the eradicator costume, inspired by, but not the real thing. Just like the ultimate costume, inspired by, but not the real thing.
There is only one form that the Superman costume comes in that the entire population of the planet will firmly recognize as the true form of the superman costume... the costume you advocate is crap IMO. It is not a superman costume. It is fundamentally way to different from the original, and doesn't fall into the category of greatness that the classic costume commands
next time, try saying it without insulting me, and I won't think of you as a complete idiot.So I'm sorry KAKArot
avidreader, i personally dont mind the undies, but ive been playing with a few pics trying to manip them so its all blue below the waist, purely for discussion in this thread, a problem i keep coming up with is the belt, what do you do with it, it kinda keeps looking out of place, do you lose it or redesign it similiar to McG...any thoughts, suggestions...