Iron_Stark
Pepperony 3000
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2007
- Messages
- 7,470
- Reaction score
- 140
- Points
- 73
That statement couldn't be more wrong for so many reasons.
1. You say 30 and up, but I think 30 - 35 would of been perfect. RDJ is in his mid 40's
2. Super Hero movies are usually Trilogy that take 3 years in between movies which means when the last movie comes out RDJ would be 50
3. Tony Stark was not 40 years old when he became Iron Man.
I usually don't care about the age of an actor, but when It comes to Super Hero movies I do especially when they are playing a character who is 10 + years younger than they are.
Don't get me wrong RDJ did a great job in here and he is an amazing actor, but his age was very obvious and I can only picture what he will look like when he's filming his third movie as Stark.
PS: No Franchise should take after 007 I hate the idea of changing actors all the time unless the last one just sucked at the role. All the constant actor change ever achieves is a bunch of idiotic arguments over who was best.
The novel said Stark was 35, I don't know why they didn't mention it in the movie.
The next movie is supposed to stark filming next year, and the Avengers movie a short time after that, which judging by Favs comments is supposed to round out his IM triology, Downey Jr will still be under 45.