Except in the comic books Mystique has traditionally worn clothing too, a long tunic, and not even blue clothing. In the movies she is buck naked. Indigo wears a blue catsuit on the TV show. So still the only thing they have in common is blue skin.
Plus Mystique has straight hair. Indigo braids her hair in Supergirl. And Indigo has smooth skin, red lights and grooves on her forehead. Mystique has bumpy skin, no grooves, no lights. So still not seeing the resemblance other than having a similar shade of blue skin. Which was likely done because a dark color looks more sinister than bright purple.
You think Mystique and Indigo were the only females who plotted to take over the world with a man?
All female character can fight anymore. Even Harley Quinn. Indigo can fight so they can show her and Supergirl fighting. Because Mystique can fight is she ripping off Catwoman?
Also can Mystique travel though the internet like Indigo does?
Mystique can morph into other body forms. Could Indigo morph into another person? If so they never showed it.
Same thing with Red Tornado nothing like the comic books. Just someone for Supergirl to fight. Oh, but he got compared to Vision a lot too. It just seems like any DC character that vaguely resembles a Marvel movie character is dubbed a rip-off. Vartox and Jemm were nothing like Vartox and Jemm from the comic books either. It's just they had no equivalent characters in a Marvel Movie.
Hmmm... you're changing the subject a lot, talking about comic book Mystique and Red Tornado. And then you're doing a lot of nitpicking like with hairstyles as though ripping off means an exact copy, and you know better than that.
Movie Mystique and CBS Indigo are definitely the only martial arts happy blue females with red hair that are the right hand and love interest of bad guys who want to save the world by taking it over the world for their race. If you can't point out a third, then maybe the idea that these are just random changes, and not changes to be like Mystique.
And since a picture is worth a thousand words, let's ask this:
Which of these two charaters:
Can you honestly say inspired the look, feel and storyline of this character:
Ra's wanted Oliver to replace him because he survived the fight (and in fact, there was a legend about that very thing). If Ra's just tore him a new one, whisked him off to Nanda Parbat, and revived him so he could brainwash him and make him his heir, it would be a whiplash-inducing turn.
Then, on top of that, the whole idea of brainwashing your successor makes no sense. I mean, okay, there's a certain internal logic to the idea that this group hasn't evolved much in all of this time because it hasn't allowed any outside perspective to penetrate it, but Season 3 left me feeling that the League of Assassins was a completely backwards model for an organization that couldn't actually survive in real life. So I feel like (and this ties into my desire for comeuppance) someone should have pointed out to Ra's how screwed up his ideology was before the end of the season.
It seems like you're talking about what makes for a great villain in general. My position is that once Ra's established himself as an obnoxious presence, the only thing he was good for as a character (not a plot device) was seeing him defeated and humiliated. In that scenario, the more he annoys me by succeeding, the more he needs to suffer in the end to justify the annoyance with a big payoff. If he'd been defeated early on without having accomplished much of anything, I would have had satisfaction in the sense of, "Yeah, f*** that guy." Having him largely getting his way throughout the season only to kind of lose but also kind of win and die with a smile at the end didn't deliver a proper "Yeah, f*** that guy." So in the end, he was annoying until he was gone.
What I would have done (without changing things drastically) would be: Oliver pretends to be brainwashed, and Ra's buys into it and thinks he's winning (same as before). Ra's attack on the city fails more badly than it did. Oliver gives Ra's some lecture about how his failure was the failure of the League of Assassins and its entire belief system. He points out that Ra's didn't realize that Oliver was tricking him, but he also had no advisors, no one to point out when he was making a mistake. This ties into Oliver learning not to try to handle things by himself, which ties the season together more. He tells Ra's that he lost because his was one group mind working against several strong individuals, that the League is a dinosaur that has no place in the modern world. They fight, but it's not Oliver losing but coming back at the end and winning. His victory is more decisive, he severely injures Ra's, and then he gets shot by the police and falls down the waterfall.
Ra's gets away, only to run into Malcolm. Malcolm reveals that he poisoned Oliver's blade just in case he wasn't willing to finish the job. Ra's can barely defend himself between his injuries and the poison. Malcolm chops off his hand and takes the ring. He gloats that he's going to become the new Ra's and do things his way before finishing Ra's off.
Yeah, f*** that guy.
Interesting. That would have been better as an ending, but the middle still needs a lot of help, that was the problem. Even for your idea to work, for us to care about the League's imbalance, we have to spend more time with the League, and more meaningful time. This takes time away from same ol' same ol' and puts Oliver in interesting new positions, with new decisions.
I agree brainwashing your heir is dumb, which is why I would have flipped it, to give the middle of the season escalation. Oliver earns' Ra's' admiration on the mountaintop when he's killed. Gets revived in secret, not reported, we see the boot cut, but no acknowlegement of Oliver for 2-3 episodes. Meanwhile, Ra's has a new bodyguard, Ubu, masked, and he's just the best and rawest. He decimates Team Arrow, who can handle the vigilante work (new dynamics on old cases) but can't handle the League (because they never get nerfed). The eventually unmask this Ubu and of course it's Oliver, but he can't go through with the killshot, because The Power of Heart, so you spend a couple episodes with Oliver battling his programming, as we are introduced to the League cast: Dark Maseo, Conflicted Nyssa, Disgraced Malcolm and their betrayals and dark missions and what not.
Meanwhile fresh char-dev for Star City crew. Oliver overcomes his programming, strikes at Ra's, is withstood, and is then offered a seat at the table and the heirship, not because of some ad-hoc prophecy, but because he's shown he's stronger of will than anyone Ra's' has ever known, and willing to kill (in this case Ra's') for the greater good. Oliver goes along with the trick, but keeps getting in deeper, betraying his friends (the Lyla kidnapping was a nice touch), actually falling for Nyssa, having to face real moral quandries (people he didn't kill earlier hurting folks, deciding whether or not to kill a heartless dictator in front of his child), all that. Meanwhile Red Arrow's been doing the things in Star City but Brick has been running roughshod over them, corrupting Star City, where the league is now positioned to kill off all the corrupt officials. Oliver might even seem to kill one. Oliver springs his trap, shows that the deaths he used to prove himself to the league were false, shows up as, obviously, the Green Arrow, and then pretty much what you said as an ending.
The point is, not so much whether Ra's' was annoying or not and why, but that there are so many options here in terms of storylines, and yet... what do we get?
Damien Darhk was excellent too. I also liked Ra's, but they did not use him anywhere near as well as they could have done.
People liked Darhk? I thought he was a horrible villain on every level. The only thing he did that was remotely interesting was cripple Felicity for three episodes.