Hostel came out last year...... Besides, it was the ****ty quality of the film, not tarantino's name that pissed me off. Hell, I hate everything he's made but Kill Bill vol 2. As for the whole Marvel lied debate, I personally liked that they tired to fool the fans... and not in the sterotypical Joe Q way. Stan Lee was in on it. The problem with your analogy Dread is that Hitchcock died years ago while Stan is still kickin ass.
Anyways, if Sentry ever got an on going, I'd keep Jenkins there. It's completely his baby. Anyone thats read that Jenkin/Stan Lee mini story knows exactly why.
Touche'. I never said my analogy was perfect. I mean Stan did play along, and I'm sure he felt it was a fun way to build up some new character. I disagree, but whatever. I'd say that it was a bit of a low blow getting Stan Lee, a legend that all Marvel fans trust, to lie for them, but I guess I just did. It's like if George Stienbrenner got Yogie Berra to lie to Yankees fans to promote something. Thankfully, this tactic was never used again.
I do agree on allowing Jenkins to write Sentry if he gets an ongoing. I mean, it IS Jenkins' creation so much like with YA and Heinberg and RUNAWAYS with BKV, so long as he feels he still has worthwhile stories to tell with Sentry, give him a go.
Admittedly, it felt odd but even with a totally random backup story in THE RETURN, I liked Jenkins' Sentry dialogue better than Bendis'.
Lol, that sounds like me
Bi polar bear. That's hillarious.
I know. THE TICK was awesome. I have the whole series on bootleg.
Thanks, but stop kissing my ass.
Fine. No compliments for you! *said in SOUP NAZI voice*
If it was so succesful, wouldn't evil Marvel be jumping at the chance to steal more money from your wallets? Lets be real, it was a moderate scuccess if anything.
I admitted that it was a moderate "scuccess" in so many words. I never said it was a bombastic hit. The point was brought up to basically say, "Look, Dread, even after they B.S.'d about it, it didn't sell 200,000 copies and Sentry went nowhere for FOUR entire years, so stop hatin' on it." That doesn't change the fact that I disliked the tactic. Especially by the nature of his origin, he has to be retconned in as some fantastically awesome guy we should all like, because he was the first until Mastermind and General got to him and made everyone forget. Blarg.
Marketing. Its that easy. Like you've said oh so many times before, its rare that all new characters survive and are well recieved. And The Sentry mini came out during a vulnerable time in the industry, so anything that could help the book out was all good.
By that logic, no marketting ploy is ever dishonest or in bad faith if it produced even a moderate success. Yes, yes, I know, in the world of business, anything that produces a profit is a success. I don't have to like it. And, as I keep saying, Marvel & Wizard have never tried this ploy again, likely because they know that controversy it caused at the time, and considering that Marvel has never found a bad idea that wasn't worth repeating, that is commendable.
I'm all for aggressive marketting for new characters. Just this tactic for SENTRY was the height of cynicism and lack of any faith in the reading public, and that is insulting.
Oh Dread, does the violin get heavy after a while. Poor baby.

I did nothing of the sort, and how you came to that conclusion is laughable. All I said was that
I didn't buy Wizard back then, so
I had no knowledge of the hype or "shameless move" being done. The thing that I find funny was, its not even like they caught you in the act. You have admittedly haven't even read the story itself. So its not like you feel betrayed financially or something. You haven't even read it. And you're coming off like a martyr of the comic book community, the vast majority of which, got over any ill feelings about the situation long ago.
By saying you had no knowedge of the Wizard thing, it is a reasonable conclusion to reason you meant, "maybe your problem was reading Wizard and taking it too seriously at the time", much as when I complain about some past Marvel solicts having spoilers for a variety of issues and storylines, some Marvel apologist will always go, "It's your own fault for reading them". So if I am a rabid, addicted fan, I should be punished for it. Brilliant. Anyway, if you didn't mean that, well, that's okay.
THE SENTRY came out when I was either finishing HS or starting college and was shortly before I started buying comics monthly again, which was in Fall 2000 to early 2001 (I'd stopped during high school, funneling a lot of my spare cash into anime). I was barely interested at the time but when the hoax was revealed, I definately felt that it was an underhanded move and thought, "Oh, well, NOW I DEFINATELY won't read it." And that wasn't an issue until Sentry popped up in NEW AVENGERS and is where he is now, a budding B-Lister moving on up.
Maybe it's petty, but to me reading THE SENTRY is rewarding a once-tried, never repeated marketting ploy of getting classic creators, a fanboy mag and the EIC's in a room and telling a blatent, bold faced lie for a sale. It's like giving a sleazy car salesman a high five. I've never really been that interested in the character anyway, just that's like a foundation of dung for me.
Bull****. This is the second time I hear you say this. You can always overcome a first impression. You're just too stubborn or too busy playing martyr to do anything to change that first impression.
The only thing anyone knows about Robin Givens is, "she posed for Playboy as Miss America". People still call Pres. Bush a ****** for his "Bushisms" in 2000 and consider him "an unelected President". And has Vanilla Ice ever escaped the 90's?
Overcoming a first impression is very difficult, if possible at all. I can't for the life of me think of anyone where I went, "Y'know, when we first met you were a total scumbag and now you're my best friend" or of anyone who felt the same way towards me. With things like comics where sometimes our biggest loves and hates come from simple, emotional connections from our past (my liking of Spider-Man stemming from watching SPIDER-FRIENDS around when SMURFS came on as a toddler, for instance), this can be especially difficult. Whenever I see SENTRY I just remember the scam first and everything and anything else second, and that's that.
Besides, there are too many trades that I "should" be buying with any spare cash that I would love to, and THE SENTRY, beyond supporting a scam, has never seemed to rise to the forefront over the dozens and dozens of trades I never have the cash for. Especially when I am not majorly interested in him anyway.