hunter rider said:
I said edited not shot,they had shot some footage but it takes a long time to get the complex and minute details of an action sequence edited correctly
Editing on the film didn't begin until shooting had wrapped, so whatever you are hearing, it's false. If Nolan and his team were able to edit a teaser, then they would've managed to slice some action scenes in there. I guess by that assumption the producers weren't able to get the action scenes edited for the
Casino Royale teaser?
I don't care what Goyer said,the 30 second thing was basically a "this is Bruce Wayne's story" spot to let ppl know the direction,Bond didn't need that because everyone knows the direction.
You should care, as Goyer was the writer on the film. That's basically saying whatever Paul Haggis said regarding
Royale, we should just throw out the window...because he's not important, right?
And actually, the trailer (which ran more than 30 seconds, more like over a minute) was edited that way to show that this Batman film would be a psychological story with character development instead of the flashy action blockbusters that were the previous installments. And if you're saying people will automatically realize that
Casino Royale is a complete restart, then the trailer didn't effectively get that across. It was just another Bond teaser, but with a new Bond. I didn't get anything new out of it, and I bet neither will audiences.
That's your opinion but i disagree,they needed something to catch the eye and that's what this did,it showcased a darker meaner Bond and some new stylistic touches
What new stylistic touches? Besides the black & white scenes, I saw nothing stylish. Just regularly cut action scenes. And Bond's been dark and mean. Pierce Brosnan wasn't the campy version of James Bond. He was dark and mean, especially during his fight scenes. I see Craig's style as nothing really that different.
Still, the footage looked good. I am eagerly anticipating this movie, but the teaser just didn't do anything for me.