Jackman spills beans on alleged troubles, Gambit and Deadpool

narrows101

Guest
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
5,039
Reaction score
0
Points
31
According to this, the whole interview is in Total Film magazine.

http://blogs.coventrytelegraph.net/thegeekfiles/2009/03/wolverine-jackman-spills-beans.html

Wolverine: Jackman spills beans on alleged troubles, Gambit and Deadpool
By David Bentley on Mar 11, 09 11:07 AM

HUGH JACKMAN, star of the upcoming prequel X-Men Origins: Wolverine, has spoken about the film in an extensive interview.

He addresses rumours of clashes between director Gavin Hood and the studio, talks about Gambit (played by Taylor Kitsch, see picture above), about creative liberties with Deadpool, and his thoughts on more Wolverine movies.

Asked about the reported production troubles, he said: "Let me make this clear. You say clashes between Gavin and the studio, but sometimes there were clashes between Gavin and I, sometimes between me and the studio. I'm not trying to spin this or cover up or anything.

"There is also, wrongly, a belief out there that tonally the studio wanted a different movie from Gavin or from me, but that is not the truth.

"They hired David Benioff. He's an A-list writer. Top writer. Character, character, character, and then the script that came to me was badass, gritty and dark in tone. It was grittier than any of the X-Men movies and fitting for the character.

"I spoke to David [Benioff]. We've always been on the same page with tone. There's never going to be 100 per cent agreement but with tone we've always been on the same page."

He said: "I've seen a cut of the film and it's really strong. I'm really happy with it. And I think whatever people think they should see it. The film is what we live and die for. The proof is in the pudding."

He went on: "I was very adamant this didn't feel like X-Men 4 in any way. People say spin-off, but I've always felt the character is strong enough to deserve a film.

"The movie's really big and we shot it partly in New Zealand, partly in Australia, as I wanted to have something decidedly different. Also we got a different director - Gavin Hood - who's an incredible dramatic storyteller with such enthusiasm."

"I had a really good go in X-Men 1, 2 and 3 - I mean Wolverine got a lot of screen time but I still felt there was a hell of a lot of mystery to him. I'd read so many of the comics' amazing sagas and I thought each one could make an amazing movie.

"There's so much inherent in that character that makes him the perfect antihero, that's the Dirty Harry, Mad Max or Indiana Jones classic screen archetype. As good a go as we'd had, I still didn't think we'd defined him.

"The job of this movie is people need to understand everything about him. A central part of storytelling is knowing where people come from and who they are. Until you know you're always going to feel unsatisfied."

He said: "It's definitely the movie seen through his eyes and the battles that he goes through. I hope the movie does it justice.

"First, we have to exceed expectations, we have to reinvent, we have to do what Daniel Craig did with Bond. Secondly we have to be badass, badass, badass! It's got to be badass. Because by the function of the story of X-Men, his evolution was becoming softer."

He said Wolverine was set in the 'not-too-distant past' and in a time where mutants are not openly talked about, where they're more an urban myth. He didn't want to 'lock down' the dates too much because he wanted an 'element of timelessness'.

"I need to 100 per cent believe that at the end, he could walk out of shot and into that bar in X-Men."

He said sequels were possible: "Well, I've always been obsessed by the Japanese story of Wolverine. It gave me a lot of inspiration. I can see the comedy of him training with samurai, I can just see it working."

But he added: "The last thing I'm going to do is flog a dead horse. If it becomes clear that we're barking up a tree that everyone's seen too often, if we're doing something people have had enough of, I'm not the kind of person to doggedly hold on."

On Gambit: "He's a little more showy than Wolverine but there's a similarity. They're outsiders, they're wisecrackers, anti-authority. In this movie, Gambit plays the role a little bit like Wolverine did in the first. He's not on anybody's side. They have a dynamic where they love giving each other s**t."

On Deadpool: "I have to be very careful how I talk about Deadpool because it's something I'm really excited about. I just can't think right now how I can tell you about it without giving away some really cool ideas. Some of Benioff's best stuff in the draft was how smartly he brought that character in.

"The things I'm thinking about now, I don't want to tell you because fans will go "Aw, that's cool". Actually some fans might be p***ed off but that's okay, I think they'll understand. We took some creative licences with him."

Deadpool, a mercenary implanted with Wolverine's healing powers, is played by Ryan Reynolds.

Jackman added that he felt the Wolverine/Sabretooth relationship had a similar competitive edge to the relationship between tennis players Jon McEnroe and Bjorn Borg.

He says he had read the McEnroe book You Cannot Be Serious in which the player had sunk into a depression when Borg retired, because he had fed on the rivalry - and Jackman feels a similar dynamic applies to the animalistic feud between Wolverine and Sabretooth.

The film is released on April 29 in the UK and on May 1 elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
nice read. thanks for posting..

Jackman added that he felt the Wolverine/Sabretooth relationship had a similar competitive edge to the relationship between tennis players Jon McEnroe and Bjorn Borg.

He says he had read the McEnroe book You Cannot Be Serious in which the player had sunk into a depression when Borg retired, because he had fed on the rivalry - and Jackman feels a similar dynamic applies to the animalistic feud between Wolverine and Sabretooth.
nice :woot:
 
"some fans might be pissed off"... Who else thinks Logan's gonna give Wilson his scars?
Probably to make it more personal like the Burton-Joker...
 
I NEED TO KNOW THE RUNTIME, HUGH!!

I like how he described the scale of the movie the most and how they wanted the tone to be different from the other X-Men movies.
 
good article, makes me feel a little better :)
 
Argh, virtually the same Deadpool quote.
 
I think it's funny how they say they don't want the movie to feel like X-Men 4, but that's exactly what it feels like to me. And for me, that's not a bad thing. I think it's great. It makes the movie feel more cohesive with the main trilogy. Nothing wrong with being more gritty, and still flowing with the series.

As far as some of the other things he says, they sound like they could add up real nicely with the things that were stated in this last "review".

The whole "depression" angle over the rivalry ending fits in with Sabretooth saving Logan, stating "Only I can kill you, brother" or whatever it is that Creed says.

The Deadpool thing sounds a lot like the stuff we've been hearing - creative licenses being Deadpool being Weapon XI, and the fans going "Aw, that's cool" when Logan scars up Deadpool, he rejects the mutations, and becomes the Deadpool fans know and love.

I also really hope that Jackman keeps talking about Logan and Remy's relationship because it's true that Remy pops up in the final battle.

All I know is that I can't wait until May 1.
 
I think it's funny how they say they don't want the movie to feel like X-Men 4, but that's exactly what it feels like to me. And for me, that's not a bad thing. I think it's great. It makes the movie feel more cohesive with the main trilogy. Nothing wrong with being more gritty, and still flowing with the series.

As far as some of the other things he says, they sound like they could add up real nicely with the things that were stated in this last "review".

The whole "depression" angle over the rivalry ending fits in with Sabretooth saving Logan, stating "Only I can kill you, brother" or whatever it is that Creed says.

The Deadpool thing sounds a lot like the stuff we've been hearing - creative licenses being Deadpool being Weapon XI, and the fans going "Aw, that's cool" when Logan scars up Deadpool, he rejects the mutations, and becomes the Deadpool fans know and love.

I also really hope that Jackman keeps talking about Logan and Remy's relationship because it's true that Remy pops up in the final battle.

All I know is that I can't wait until May 1.

But don't they say that
Logan cuts Deadpool's head off? So how can we expect Deadpool to become the character the fans know and love
, ya know?
 
Marketing politics bs article.
 
the more articles, the better.. keep people talking about the film.. bring on the cereal, the bedsheets..
 
Marketing politics bs article.

Well, all interviews in the lead-up to a movie will be 'marketing'. So I don't see your point here, as if trying in some paranoid way to find something suspicious in what is obviously a promotional interview.
 
Cool read, thanks for posting! :woot:
 
But don't they say that
Logan cuts Deadpool's head off? So how can we expect Deadpool to become the character the fans know and love
, ya know?

Maybe it grows back after the credits. Or he doesn't chop off his whole head, just claws out a good portion of his face.
 
Maybe it grows back after the credits. Or he doesn't chop off his whole head, just claws out a good portion of his face.


Hopefully or maybe this is all a bull**** article to begin with...
 
He pretty much admits that they ****ed up Deadpool.
 
Spaced's stuff shows he gets changed but it doesn't seem to
hint he dies. He seems to get back to Deadpool form.

Though screwing up Deadpool, it does show that Wolverine wasn't the only one worked on. It kinda shows how he and others get played by the gov't and what could have happened to him...or the other mutants. Makes sense to the story but not homage to the comics but come on look what they did to Mystique in the past, no Gambit in any X movie, Rogue being Rogue-less, Cyclops being portrayed to be hated instead of the leader, made Sabretooth a brute, Juggernaut a mindless "mutant" when he wasn't, etc...we can go on and on but the stories in X1 and X2 were good whether they were true to the comics or not.
 
They could have made Weapon XI actually Weapon XI instead of making Deadpool Weapon XI....I don't see how that changes the story.
 
What?

If you're saying his head won't grow back even with the power, it has in the comics.
Hmmm...
Last time I saw...he had to put his head back on place to regenerate
 
They could have made Weapon XI actually Weapon XI instead of making Deadpool Weapon XI....I don't see how that changes the story.

Yeah i dont see why they hade to make that change


And also judging from this article Jackman sounds like it wasn;t the best experience

i think we can all pretty much assume this movie is going to get really bad reviews

Oh well i think it looks really cool
 
They could have made Weapon XI actually Weapon XI instead of making Deadpool Weapon XI....I don't see how that changes the story.

Probably because they wanted a main villain that's recognizable, not some nameless random mutant that nobody knows about.
 
Probably because they wanted a main villain that's recognizable, not some nameless random mutant that nobody knows about.

So they turn Deadpool into it?

Thats ******ed

They should have just hade Sabretooth be the final fight
 
So they turn Deadpool into it?

Thats ******ed

They should have just hade Sabretooth be the final fight

Sabretooth doesn't provide the challenge of having a whole slew of mutant powers all bundled up into one.

We already have 3 fights with Sabretooth in the film, and Wolverine has a clear advantage over Sabretooth in the adamantium skeleton. Deadpool provides a good challenge to Wolverine.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"