Stringer
CHAMPS AGAIN!
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2005
- Messages
- 7,758
- Reaction score
- 1,542
- Points
- 103
bunk said:This line bothers me the most:
so using what he needs to get his vision across.
This is a stronger idication that Bay really does have a lot of control over the script. That worries me.
Also, how he said they're not focusing as much on the smaller personal stories. Thats fine if he's referring to the teen romance part, it sucks if he's also talking about any stories between the autobots or decepticons.
CFlash said:If you do a search on past articles about this, you'd see stuff about this. Bay wouldn't agree to do the movie until his people (Orci/Kurtz) had a chance to touch up the script. At one point there was a deadline he imposed for a "revision" and it was missed... which delayed the movie for a year.
So, yes, Bay has a lot of creative control over the script. I do however have a hunch that Spielberg will be a lot more hands on in post-production (editing, effects, sound, music... etc)... it's kinda his way. It's why many movies he doesn't direct still have a markedly Spielberg vibe.
CFlash said:If you do a search on past articles about this, you'd see stuff about this. Bay wouldn't agree to do the movie until his people (Orci/Kurtz) had a chance to touch up the script. At one point there was a deadline he imposed for a "revision" and it was missed... which delayed the movie for a year.
So, yes, Bay has a lot of creative control over the script. I do however have a hunch that Spielberg will be a lot more hands on in post-production (editing, effects, sound, music... etc)... it's kinda his way. It's why many movies he doesn't direct still have a markedly Spielberg vibe.
bunk said:Yes but initially I hadn't heard the words "his vision". I have no problem with Bay wanting his own writers to revise the script, especially if they're better writers. That aspect alone doesn't mean to me Bay is controlling the story, only that he wants a script that will fit the way he directs as far as pacing and overall style is concerned.
CFlash said:Well, this says it all "increased the big military aspect, whereas I had focused on some of the smaller, personal stories."
This shows that that he has changed things. Perhaps for the better? Maybe. But, more likely its to fit his "style of movies" (bombastic fluff IMHO). But who knows.
How did anyone take what was in the article out of context? and whos making it into big news? We're just discussing the article.Tad Fatherton said:obviously not you. this isn't big news guys, every director does revisions to scripts that are given to them. you people take everything out of context, just like how you're all freaking out because they said this movie is based on the original show. guess what, it is based on the original show, they just didn't want to recycle the same story over and over again, because unike cflash, most people would get bored seeing the same repetitive story over and over again.
Tad Fatherton said:because unike cflash, most people would get bored seeing the same repetitive story over and over again.
Stringer said:How did anyone take what was in the article out of context? and whos making it into big news? We're just discussing the article.
1) you're extremely dense. there has been over two decades worth of the transformers storyline.CFlash said:1) Yeah. Because there have been sooooo many Transformers movies.
2) And, yes, people do get bored... with the same simplistic McGuffin story.
Tad Fatherton said:i don't know how, but cflash managed to do it. this thread is making big news out of it.
read it for meCFlash said:You're a psycho. Go back and read the thread again with your eyes open.
bunk said:But do you think any of these "personal stories" are having to do solely with the transformers themselves? I don't know if I'd want that cut.