General_Grievous
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2004
- Messages
- 3,165
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I agree what withthe fact that we are dealing with the early stages of Batmans crusade
Obsidian said:Don't laugh at me, this is just a suggestion:
Michael Keaton
Yeah, I know he played Batman previously, but he's damn good at playing psychotic characters. Just watch "Desperate Measures". It will never happen I know because this franchise will distance itself away from the previous films. It's just a suggestion.
Obsidian said:Don't laugh at me, this is just a suggestion:
Michael Keaton
Yeah, I know he played Batman previously, but he's damn good at playing psychotic characters. Just watch "Desperate Measures". It will never happen I know because this franchise will distance itself away from the previous films. It's just a suggestion.
Two Face said:No thank you.
Were we watching the same movies??The Techno Bat said:I have heard and read alot about how some people think that Crispin Glover might be too old to play the part of The Joker, well he is only 41 years old. But if that is a determining factor then Hugo Weaving (45) is out. And so is Willem Dafoe (50)
I think age should have nothing to do with it. I like Crispin Glover as The Joker, and not liking him just because he was in Back to the Future is not really fair, he was great in the Charlie Angels movies, and was really creepy in Willard.
Ha! understatement is fun! I could live with Dafoe he's a realy good actor, but the whole green goblin thing is weird because that's pretty much all he was in that movie, the Joker on a gliderOldman = Gordon said:Dafoe please.
I don't know I think Glover can act he has been doing it since the early 80's. He has done tv show's like:so I say age is of very little importance compared to acting abilty( of which Glover has none).