Jumper 2?

[Commodore Schmidlapp]

The first was just ok, I found it moderately enjoyable. It's one of those it was ok but I don't see myself watching it again. I'm not sure I'd see the second one though.

 

[Max Newlander]

Jumper is kind of like Hancock to me. The premise great and potential was massive, but both totally s**ked the big one, big time.

Hayden was utterly hopeless, and clearly cemented that fact considering he was equally as hopeless in Episode II and III.

I would have no desire as would most of the public IMO to go and see a sequel.

Straight to DVD seems about right if its ever green lit.

 

[Dang1ing Nuts]

The original sucked. It was literally like reading the prologue of a book and then putting down the book and never reading it again.

Did you ever stop to think that they did it on purpose to setup an awesome second movie?

 

[Movies205]

Did you ever stop to think that they did it on purpose to setup an awesome second movie?

It was not intentional it was poor writing which my post has already pointed out why it feels like this. The lack of a character arc really destroy the film hence why it feels like an extended first act.

 

[Cmill216]

Jumper had some genuinely sensational effects....but it failed in nearly every other aspect.

So I'll pass on a sequel. Although, compared to Hancock, it was The Dark Knight.

 

[Captain Planet!]

There is no reason to make a sequel.

 

[Symbiotic]

Well with the way the first one ended, I wanna see what happens next.