I can understand the reverence for Chris Nolan, because his resume really speaks for itself, but Snyder? I really don't understand why he is lauded as some kind of acclaimed filmmaker.
I can understand the reverence for Chris Nolan, because his resume really speaks for itself, but Snyder? I really don't understand why he is lauded as some kind of acclaimed filmmaker.
I can understand the reverence for Chris Nolan, because his resume really speaks for itself, but Snyder? I really don't understand why he is lauded as some kind of acclaimed filmmaker.
I don't think people gave Feige enough credit for making MCU what it is today. When MCU was started, they had to borrow loans from Merrill Lynch in order to produce their movies, and they hired RDJ (who was almost blacklisted by Hollywood due to his past drug & arrest record & was paid less than Terrance Howard) to become the new face of their franchise. They also had to do without Marvel's most recognizable properties, who were Spider-Man and the X-Men, as the Avengers were more like a B-list team from the Marvel Comics.
Now, after 3 movies that grossed over a billion apiece and each movie is a hit, the MCU is the strongest franchise in Hollywood. And they couldn't have done it without Kevin Feige.
Didn't knew about the Merrill Lynch loans. Even more impressive from those 10 years ago.
He's really not. A few of the more obsessive fanboys on this board treat him as such. But I don't think any credible person would opine Snyder is even in the same league as Nolan. In fact, I think in any intellectually honest conversation, it would be hard to place Snyder in a caliber higher than someone like Paul W.S. Anderson.
Snyder is fantastic at creating visually spectacular scenes and outstanding action moments, too bad he puts them in mediocre films with convoluted or outright bad storytelling.
Snyder have eye for visuals, I give you that, but damn.. I wish he used more practical effects instead of using green screen and overuse CGI so much.
Right. And it should be noted, that it was far more calculated and tempered risk than what Warners did. Feige didn't just jump into a 1 billion dollar team up movie after two semi-flops. He started with smaller risks (Iron Man) and built up to it, producing quality and successful movies. Basically, he put his studio in a position where even if Avengers flopped, he would still have 3 or 4 solo franchises that could hold their own. Its the opposite of what Warners did.
In 2005, the Marvel board approved Maisel's plan and a seven-year, $525 million financing deal with Merrill Lynch was announced that would launch Marvel Studios, an internal production company that would give Marvel complete creative control over their films (an agreement was reached with Paramount Pictures who would market and distribute the films).
But, to get that $525 million, Marvel had to put something up as collateral: almost everything they had.
The deal included 10 properties Captain America, The Avengers, Nick Fury, Black Panther, Ant-Man, Cloak & Dagger, Doctor Strange, Hawkeye, Power Pack, and Shang-Chi and if the Marvel Studios plan failed, they would lose the rights to every single one of those properties. The bank would own them and the plans for a Marvel Cinematic Universe would be dead.
Now that it's finished its second weekend, it looks like this movie has a ceiling of earning around $230M domestic based on my calculations. And it will probably end up lower. That's...not good.
Overseas isn't looking that promising either, though the totals there are bit more uncertain, but something in the low $400M's seems likely.
So it's looking likely to finish below MoS.
It may have been calculated, but it was still a huge risk.
Least now we know we are finally going to get that Shang Chi movie in Phase 4. Woo.![]()
It may have been calculated, but it was still a huge risk.
Final intl wknd for #JusticeLeague* came in at $71.5M boosting cume to $311M & global tally to $482.9M. Last yr #BatmanVSuperman absorbed 78% of its worldwide final by end of 2nd wknd. A similar path ahead for JL puts it on course for a final of about $650M.
I knew the movie would most likely be poorly received based on trailers, but I was still expected the film to get to around 800M box office on the strength of the brands involved.
I think the studio probably thought so, too. 650M is an unmitigated disaster. That's less than Man of Steel. Granted, MoS' international number is inflated by the dollar being stronger now, so this movie is doing more business internationally by quite a bit.
Just not enough to matter, given that the domestic number is so much lower.
This whole thing has been an exercise in futility. I can only hope that they finally learn their lesson. They must take a long-term view and build a reputation for quality.
If they don't, this will keep happening, especially for the lesser-known properties.