blind_fury
Avenger
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2003
- Messages
- 13,584
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
So the questions becomes why would Bay agree to do an adaptation of source material he resents?^ ^ ^
Well said.
However, I think the makers of the movie already set the tone for the banter. Whereas many filmmakers responsible for movies discussed on these boards love the source material and are inspired by it-- oftentimes on a personal level-- (even if they sometimes miss the mark a bit like Bryan Singer with Superman), the folks most directly responsible for Transformers (Michael Bay, Don Murphy) are far from being fans.
In fact, they've often seemed to hate the source and suggest its simply a "toy commercial" or dumb cartoon. Their misguided "improvements" on it can only be for the best, right? A very similar idealogy plagued Godzilla 98 where the filmmakers made almost the same EXACT comments during the film's making ("this movie wont be a guy in a dumb rubber suit").
Transformers definately needed to be revamped. But some of the changes in the movie are really obvious parodies. And the filmmakers comments, treatment of fans, and disgust with the fans and source material only serve to rile up the fans more.
I'll give you an hint. It starts with an "m" and rhymes with "honey".
Bay probably heard Peter Jackson made 300 million from LOTR and figured a franchise was the way to go. Why else would he adapt something he resents?