Batmannerism
Super-unknown
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2012
- Messages
- 7,096
- Reaction score
- 4,768
- Points
- 103
Correction-
Superman could go faster then light from what i read but he can't go transwarp speed,but thor can.
Thor in the comics now could fly without his hammer.
Comic thor and hulk info below.
Thor
Superhuman Speed
Hulk and some of his powers.
Some say thor is stronger then superman in the comics too,and that could be true,but movie thor seems about the same level or a tie to mos superman to me.
Thor
Powers and abilities
Dude,
I'm just going by what we saw in the movies (the comics is a whole different thing) and Thor didn't show any super-speed in any of them, in fact I remember him jogging to catch up with Malekith at the end of TDW (Hulk is pretty fast in his films, but not like Superman or the other Kryptonians). And again, Thor vs Kurse = ass kicking for Thor, saved by Loki. Whereas Superman vs Zod = Broken neck for Zod.
All I'm saying is that if you actually watch MOS and Thor TDW /Avengers, it's pretty obvious who's stronger, more durable, and faster. Having said that, Thor is definitely a better fighter, which would make a big difference - but not enough of a difference for Thor to win.
Again, that's IMO, just my opinion.
If you want to bring the comics into it then there's this.....

and this


But they team up anyway, and end up buddies
and of course this, which would piss me off if I was a fan of Thor. I mean,
this is just ****ing stupid.

If you read some blogs on the internet, or even some of the Marvel sites, Thor can pretty much do anything (like Travel in time, cast magic spells, use the Thor-force, the God-blast and he could probably shoot fire-balls out of his ass) - that's kind of why I prefer Superman, as he's a much simpler character, strong, fast, he flies, melts stuff by looking at it, and is pretty much indestructible.
In the same way, I prefer movie Thor to comic book Thor, because he's a simpler character, the God of Thunder, which makes him a big tough guy with a magic hammer who controls the weather -all that other weird stuff just gets in the way.
Unlike a lot of people, I really enjoyed Thor 2: TDW. I thought it was a lot of fun, and the Dark Elves were much better bad-guys than the Frost Giants (although Malekith was really under-used as a villain). That's saying a lot, as I'm not a Thor fan at all.
I find it strange that die-hard Thor fans didn't seem to enjoy TDW that much ( as a die-hard Superman fan I loved MOS, although the same could be said for that film), the action was pretty good, it had a nice mix of light and dark in terms of tone. If they had just left Kat Dennings out of it, it would have been awesome.
BTW I read that blog, and that bit about it not having a lot of action until the last 1/3 was just crap. Obviously the person hadn't really seen Man of Steel, because they missed the fact that it started with the Kryptonian civil war action scene, which included 2 vicious fist fights, and and exploding planet.
Then there's a break where they actually develop the main character, because that's what origin movies do. Not much action there, except the schoolbus crash, the Tornado, and the exploding oil rig.
Of course then there's the battle of Smallville, in which the town gets wrecked, mostly by the army jets and helicopters, although Supes and the Kryptonians do a lot of property damage too.
And of course the last 25 minutes of so which involves a big chunk of Metropolis getting zapped, and a pretty apocalyptic fist fight between Zod and Supes (come on Dude, none of the Thor v Loki fights are even close).
So, I kind of disagree.
But hey, if you're a Thor fan, and you enjoyed Thor TDW, that's cool, it's a fun movie, and I thought the action was well done. I give MOS a 9/10,
because I'm a Superman fan, but I give Thor TDW a solid 8/10 - I reckon it was at least as much fun as Avengers, and the Dark Elves were much scarier bad guys than the Chitauri (yawn).