Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]499847[/split]
I questioned that myself. It's just so.... WEIRD![]()
These are probably 3 of the last people I'd choose to play Peter Parker... I don't know how credible the 1,500 number is, but how could these actors be left in the 6? Just awful...
These are probably 3 of the last people I'd choose to play Peter Parker... I don't know how credible the 1,500 number is, but how could these actors be left in the 6? Just awful...
Either Marvel & Sony are joking, or the kids are only there to make the list become bigger. The actual competition for the role is just between Rowe, Butter and TomThe shortlist was nothing like what I was expecting. Those three threw me off entirely. They don't suit the role at all
Wow, someone really photoshopped Dylan's head on Chadwick BosemanThis been posted?
![]()
This been posted?
![]()
This been posted?
![]()
Wow, someone really photoshopped Dylan's head on Chadwick Boseman
Lol
what/where/when's this from?
NOOOOO, please don't let it be Dylan.This been posted?
![]()
I don't think you can realistically expect a Matt Lintz or that other kid to carry a billion dollar movie franchise. Probably goes for Plummer and Rowe too.
Butterfield and Tom still seem like the most likely options at the end of the day.
NOOOOO, please don let it be Dylan.
Give me Lerman, Highmore, Sangster, Aiken, Dillane, Bill Milner, Ellar Coltrane.... even JAKE T AUSTIN!!!!!
I'm desperate!!! Save me!![]()
![]()
I think Tom Holland could be good, he certainly looks the part.
That short list of directors was dreadful though, seriously, absolutly terrible.
I think Tom Holland could be good, he certainly looks the part.
That short list of directors was dreadful though, seriously, absolutly terrible.