Saw the film last night, here's my take.
Compared to the 95 film, it's worse. Mk 95 was an enjoyable, super cheesy B movie, with terrible special effects, but didn't take itself seriously. Christopher Lambert was hilarious as Raiden, the guys who played Cage and Liu Kang were fun, the chick who played Sonya was hot and had a bit more acting talent/charisma. Overall the writing was better, with generally greater setup and payoff for most the characters, although Liu Kang is the central character here. While Shang Tsung is much, much better developed in 95, Sub Zero is a much nastier villain in 2021, although his motives are pretty murky. All in all I thought MK 95 the better film , although some parts of it are arguably worse.
Enough about the original, on to MK 2021:
The Good:
Kano, played straight up for laughs, and pretty successfully so. Much more fleshed out than in 95, but he's still pretty thin - still he gives us a lot of laughs. He gets to do his finishing move though, nice !
Cole. Has just enough presence and charisma to be interesting.
Sub Zero, really menacing - a good performance by Joe Taslim although why he hates Hanzo is a bit murky.
Scorpion, Hiroyuki Sanada did a stint with the royal Shakespeare company, and has the martial arts chops to carry off a role like this. He's simply awesome as Hanzo.
Fight sequences. Well they didn't shy away from the gore and generally the fight scenes were good - with some ott ridiculous moments, like Lao Kung's hat slicing bird chick in half.
Hanzo and Sub Zero's first fight is great , a real highlight.
The final battle is convincingly brutal and prolonged although it could have benefitted from a greater sense of narrative.
Goro: probably ate up most of the cgi budget, but worth it because he had some personality and serious menace ( could have used a few more lines). One of the few improvements from 95.
The bad:
Sonya starts out being incredibly OTT and unconvincing at the same time. She delivers the explanation about her back story and the tournament is terrible, and done with all the conviction of a fart joke. She does get a bit better, but she's not a good enough actress to do an American accent and sound believable when delivering ridiculous lines.
Shang Tsung. Absolutely terrible, other than wanting to win he's a cardboard cut out - especially compared to MK 95, in which he was fearsome and dangerous adversary.
The Outworld plot angle - most folks know a bit about the tournament set up, but here the writers and director take zero effort in setting the scene - unlike MK 95. The film just lurches into the fight sequences because the bad guys decide it's time?
They should have either dropped the Outworld story angle or done a decent job, but we got a far superior job in 95, with far worse effects.
Outworld itself is almost the same exterior location as just before the temple - just with a different color filter. It was ****ing lazy, by any standards.
The superpowers. Because we're given very little build up or explanation, they make no sense. Some of them are psychic ( pyrokinesis), some are magical weapons ( Cole's armour, Jax's arms) and some are....eye laser beams ? Wtf ? They just don't make any sense. MK 95 does a much better job by not really bothering with these much at all.
Lord Raiden.....he's just kind of there.
So, all in all not a terrible movie, not a good one and not as good as 95, but with a few real stand out moments - especially the opening fight !
The meh:
The villain fighters. Only Kabal had a tiny spark of personality, otherwise they were pretty bland, generic bad guys.
Liu Kang, also felt very generic. The actor delivers all his lines totally deadpan with very little expression, as if he doesn't give a **** - so neither do we.
Lao Kung, looks cool for about 2 minutes and does a really deadly trick with his hat.....and then dies because.....the story needs him to ?
If the writers were trying to set up a self sacrifice, they needed to do a better job.
Cole's family....they're just there.