Yellow Cyclone
Pessimist
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2003
- Messages
- 1,449
- Reaction score
- 211
- Points
- 73
hickman's namor is absolutely perfect. so much swagger and giving no crap about what others think
I reckon that spidey news put the nail in the coffin for namor. The Sony/marvel deal was held up as an example of how to make it work and now we know it hasn’t I don’t think marvel or Disney will try again with another studio
Eh... Namor's issues are more in line with Hulk and they still used Hulk.I reckon that spidey news put the nail in the coffin for namor. The Sony/marvel deal was held up as an example of how to make it work and now we know it hasn’t I don’t think marvel or Disney will try again with another studio
I don't know about that. What about Hulk? He was used in team films but the distribution rights were still held by Universal. Why is Namor like Spidey and not like Hulk?
Because namor was sold before hulk at a very different time.
Namor, like Spider-Man, was sold when marvel was nearly bankrupt just to keep the lights on. So they basically have the whole character.
Hulk’s rights were sold during marvel’s very brief independent studios period basically with the idea that universal would organise distribution but have no control over the product (that was before Disney bought marvel). That’s why hulk can appear in a supporting role but no longer as the lead
As far as I know, Namor was like Hulk in that he can be used in team up films and whatnot, but he can't be in a stand-alone without Universal distributing.
He's not like Spider-Man or the X-Men because those required a film be in production by a certain time and he doesn't have such deal, obviously.
Feige has commented on it once and all he really said was his rights were "tricky"That's as far as I know too, but, obviously, I don't know very far.
What the hell kind of arrangement did Marvel make with this character? Namor hasn't been featured in a single movie since Marvel licensed the rights decades ago, yet they've never reverted back to them?
And apparently his cousin rogue Atlantean warlord Attuma played by Josué Maychi
They really are going all in
![]()
I imagine Attuma will be the main catalyst between the two and the true villain, and Namor somewhat being billed as villain, comes off more Anti-Hero as should be.
Looks like Platos "beyond the pillars of Hercules" meant straight through to the Seno Mexicano and the Yucatán Channel
Race-swaps pisses me off a lot. But in this case is justified. In the myth is beyond pillars of Hercules as you said, it has been theorized that was related to Mesoamericans and the take could be different from what DC showed us.
And apparently his cousin rogue Atlantean warlord Attuma played by Josué Maychi
They really are going all in #Aztlántis.
Plato's "beyond the pillars of Hercules" apparently meant straight through to the Seno Mexicano and the Yucatán Channel
![]()
I imagine Attuma will be the main catalyst between the two "nations" and the true villain, and Namor somewhat being billed as villain, comes off more noble Anti-Hero as he should.
I don't know about that. What about Hulk? He was used in team films but the distribution rights were still held by Universal. Why is Namor like Spidey and not like Hulk?
Eh... Namor's issues are more in line with Hulk and they still used Hulk.
..That’s why hulk can appear in a supporting role but no longer as the lead
As far as I know, Namor was like Hulk in that he can be used in team up films and whatnot, but he can't be in a stand-alone without Universal distributing.
So a Namor solo flick is off the table but he can appear in team up flicks.
Marvel Studios Boss Addresses Namor's Complicated Rights Status - IGN