MahvelBaby!
Superhero
- Joined
- May 1, 2011
- Messages
- 6,942
- Reaction score
- 2,715
- Points
- 103
Hope it's good *crosses fingers*
They gave Endgame 3/5 so they arent big fans of fantasy stuff, but the show may still suck. Cant believe it will be as dull as Iron Fist though and I sat through all that, lol.
Well, that is how they are pushing it. But it's one review. That being said, it really should be getting good reviews, even if it is just okay. When it comes to RT, genre stuff usually fairs well. I am looking at you CW shows...First "pro" review is 2/5 from Financial Times. It broke embargo and was deleted. Mostly mockery and the only thing I got from it is that it fails to be Game of Thrones. I don't know if it tried to be, because they're really different to begin with... Also, the review is based on the first 5 episodes.
Well, that is how they are pushing it. But it's one review. That being said, it really should be getting good reviews, even if it is just okay. When it comes to RT, genre stuff usually fairs well. I am looking at you CW shows...
I thought they're banking mostly on Cavill, he's basically the only recognizable face on the show, and I remember GoT promos to be quite different. Granted I didn't follow them closely.Well, that is how they are pushing it. But it's one review. That being said, it really should be getting good reviews, even if it is just okay. When it comes to RT, genre stuff usually fairs well. I am looking at you CW shows...
I thought they're banking mostly on Cavill, he's basically the only recognizable face on the show, and I remember GoT promos to be quite different. Granted I didn't follow them closely.
And I SERIOUSLY hope Witcher is A LOT better than anything CW.
I prefer fresh faces (or less known veterans like you mentioned) too. I never fault a movie or series for not having stars. I just don't see much similarities between GoT and Witcher promos...I mean in terms of stardom yeah, but there are other recognizable veterans in the cast. MyAnna Buring, Lars Mikkelsen, people like that. Honestly, though I find it to the show's benefit. A lot of new, fresh faces here.
I prefer fresh faces (or less known veterans like you mentioned) too. I never fault a movie or series for not having stars. I just don't see much similarities between GoT and Witcher promos...
They are different. Witcher leans more heavily into fantasy and sword & sorcery IMO. I think it's a lot more "pulpy." And by pulp, I mean old-school pulp sword & sorcery fantasy stuff.
I'm my opinion The Witcher is way closer to Conan the Barbarian (movie and book) than Game of Thrones (tv version).
I looked this up a couple of days ago. Apparently the embargo drops at midnight, the same time it releases.I hope that's the case but... seriously, NO reviews yet?
Let's be fair. No reviews, no matter their quality, are going to stop us from watching this. So we will make up our own minds very soon.Kind of want this to be good for Cavill's sake who seems to genuinely care more than usual about the role and fought hard to get it, but that alone wont necessarily mean it will turn out good.
The lack of reviews this close, is somewhat disturbing, all we have to go on is some initial tweets to the first 5 or so episodes some got to see which was mostly positive. I guess tomorrow though we find out for ourselves anyway, still excited to see what they came up with anyway.
Vision, what are you looking forward to the most?1 more day...