Superman Returns New details on S2's fit in SR...

dude lois and clark were a couplke for several years before he left. he obviously did her at least once, hes superman.
 
already a thread about this.

but thanks.
 
Odd....I wonder why he would say that when he cleary said in the start of filming SR took elements from S2. I'm still sticking to what he said not by this article.
 
Excel said:
dude lois and clark were a couplke for several years before he left. he obviously did her at least once, hes superman.

Without an on-screen catalyst, I doubt the kid is his, I don't think Singer'd make reference to something we hadn't seen, at least, not of that magnitude.
 
dark_b said:
already a thread about this.

but thanks.

I apoligize, I hadn't seen a thread with a title making it obvious this topic was contained therein.
 
Superman \S/ said:
Odd....I wonder why he would say that when he cleary said in the start of filming SR took elements from S2. I'm still sticking to what he said not by this article.
he said both many times.
 
DocLathropBrown said:
I apoligize, I hadn't seen a thread with a title making it obvious this topic was contained therein.
the other thread is about the vague sequel. :)
 
Superman \S/ said:
Odd....I wonder why he would say that when he cleary said in the start of filming SR took elements from S2. I'm still sticking to what he said not by this article.

Because the script obviously changed alot since those early days.
 
Anyway, I'm now confident that the kid ain't his. Not that I think Singer'd be dumb enough to do something that terrible in the first place. He treats Superman better than he does X-Men.
 
I love how he recognizes that SUPERMAN II wasn't that good.

"Vague history" just means this:

Clark Kent grew up in Smallville
His father died, and he left home
He learned who he was via Jor-El
He worked at the Daily Planet
He became Superman
He fell in love with Lois Lane
He battled Lex Luthor

It could even be applied to the comic book mythos.
 
That had been posted here before. Which means the whole sex between Clark and Lois thing is left in the open.
 
You do realise that the "evidence" is on a forum with one reply ?

I simply do not believe it. singer has said all along and it is well documented that 1&2 are in this film's history and to disregard 3 & 4.

I can't believe that after all this time, you are actually believing this BS ?!
 
wtf singer. Just Scrap this vague history stuff and Do everything from a new continuity like Smallville. It worked pretty well for that show, people like it, so I don't see why this has to be in any way linked to the old movies except some design choices.... ****

....it'll probably be a great memorable movie anyway that people will love and all that, but this is confusing me now how it stands in the continuity with the old flicks partially. I've never heard of this ever being done before.
 
Captain Villa said:
You do realise that the "evidence" is on a forum with one reply ?

I simply do not believe it. singer has said all along and it is well documented that 1&2 are in this film's history and to disregard 3 & 4.

I can't believe that after all this time, you are actually believing this BS ?!

Never said i believed it.
 
Captain Villa said:
You do realise that the "evidence" is on a forum with one reply ?

I simply do not believe it. singer has said all along and it is well documented that 1&2 are in this film's history and to disregard 3 & 4.

I can't believe that after all this time, you are actually believing this BS ?!
but i remember that he once said that superman 2 has nothing to do with this movie.
 
Singer just needed a version of superman (there are many many versions) to use as his foundation. He proabably figured usisng the movie version was the best since that is how superman is most widely known. Even smallville had their fortress of solitude look like the one form superman the movie.
It doesn't mean he needs to directly reference individual events of the original movies. The more intereviews i read the more i think this isn't really a sequel, just an original story that already has superman existing. It is probably why there is no reference to the supervillians in the movie.

This doesn't necessarily mean the kid is not supermans...Singer can allude to the fact that they slept togehter before he left since they were in love....i really have no idea on that point. Kinda like how you accept star wars (in 1977) without seeing the pre-quels becasue lucas alluded to the events......(which 30 years later we did finally see).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
200,530
Messages
21,752,813
Members
45,587
Latest member
hugoodeww
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"