SuperDaniel
Superhero
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2001
- Messages
- 9,782
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 56
Sorry if i was rude, Matt. Seriously. I just thought it was a good joke and it was funny to see the Crystal Ball. Thats it. Sorry again.
Lobster Charlie said:Why not? We have the technology and talent to make some pretty bad-assed looking updated versions of Superman's villains. I mean, I'd rather see them try something new, bold, and daring instead of what seems to be a near-remake of the original!
Kane said:Theres obviously still potential for that in the sequels, they just needed some familiar ground (the Superman VS Lex thing) to kick off the franchaise again, since thats what the general public is aware of vaguely.
The good news is that the writers basically confirmed (in the moviehole interview) that supervillians will be featured in the sequels. They just needed to kickstart things off on some familarial territory....as opposed to doing it the Tim Burton way. They also said the seeds for the sequels will be planted in this film....
SpiderDaniel said:Sorry if i was rude, Matt. Seriously. I just thought it was a good joke and it was funny to see the Crystal Ball. Thats it. Sorry again.
Matt said:You don't need to kick things off the traditional way. Burton did it the traditional way (Batman vs Joker). Singer is doing the traditional way. He took three villians very few, if any people have ever heard of and made an outstanding movie. Singer is very much so, taking the safe, boring route.
Matt said:BB had Scarecrow and Ra's. Batman is human, that is why villians like Two-Face, Joker, Riddler, Ra's (AKA, villians with no powers) work for him.
Superman needs a physical threat, and an evil continent doesn't cut it. Luthor needs muscle. Someone like Metallo would've been perfect, he could've been explained in five minutes, Luthor could've created him, and we could've had an epic battle.
RedIsNotBlue said:After this "requel" we better see a sequel with a supervillain. We better not get some **** like Lex in an Iron Man suit.
Kane said:Ya I think obviously names like 'Metallo' and 'Brainiac' will be devised by the Daily Planet writers or media as names for these villians.
'Superman' was also a name devised by the media.
In the movie itself, they can call them John Corben and Milton Fine or Vril Dox.
Kane said:I was watching Batman Begins again, and I realized how well it works when the villians are real and human. Even Ras, a very magical/mystical based character in the comics, was portrayed in a very real, human manner.
Superman may be an alien, but in this film...hes very human (possibly more real than any previous Superman portrayal)....meaning a non-geek audience of all ages would be able to enjoy the film without being alienated (no pun intended).
I think their approach was right...build up an audience first with a very human movie (bringing Supes back to the bigscreen for the first time in 30 years)....and then break into more sci-fi based comicbook stuff for the future films (supervillians like Brainiac, Metallo etc....)
If we can objectify this decision outside the realm of being hardcore comicbook fans, it does actually seem like a very reasonable and logical apporach for the mainstream audience, who likely arent major sci-fi fans. Everyone (comicbook fans or not) know that Superman's arch nemesis has always been Lex Luthor, and that familiarity will be a good draw for them to see this flick. The great thing is both writers confirmed (via Moviehole.com) that supervillians will appear in the sequels and alot of elements relating to the sequels will be set up in Superman Returns.
So I'm finally convinced this was a wise decision, what do you guys think?
dark_b said:it was very creative.
Kane said:They said there would be. Nolan also recently said that the sequel to Begins will be VERY comic-book inspired and WB has allowed them to go nuts with it.
So maybe this reality concept is just a good way to kick off the frainchaise, re-build an audience.