FlawlessVictory
Superhero
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Messages
- 8,619
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Doctor Jones, I hate to be the spelling police, but it's Hal Jordan, not Jordon for your sig.
Darth is a masochist
Of course I've talked about things that it turned out I didn't like. That's beside the point. What is on point is that I've never spent time talking about something I have no interest in seeing.
Anyway, you're not worth talking to. 'Bye now.
Why the hell do people think this won't get made? They have a leading man, director, four drafts of a script and they need a tentpole film and another DC franchise with a big budget. Everythiing is in place, everything seems confident enough to get moving. It's in January sure, but it's pre production. And it's even better. The more time means the more they can make a better film and screenplay. It's better for this than to plunge into it.
Yeah, they'll shut down a major film like this all of a sudden when they need a WB summer movie for 2011. How smart.
It's the WB.
I ask again....Why does it matter???Talking about a movie you were interested in but ended up disliking is very different from spending time talking about a movie you have no interest in seeing. Anyone who can't distinguish between the two is perhaps the kind of "special" person they like to allude to in the midst of their bluster.
Doctor Jones, I hate to be the spelling police, but it's Hal Jordan, not Jordon for your sig.
I think it's because the spectre of JLA:Mortal looms large over this (and all other planned DC projects) in a big way.
The way that movie seemed to implode made fanboys all around the world a lot wearier about "Go-projects"...
That movie more than any other showed us that a movie can have a director, a script, a cast and shooting date and STILL not happen.
Talking about a movie you were interested in but ended up disliking is very different from spending time talking about a movie you have no interest in seeing. Anyone who can't distinguish between the two is perhaps the kind of "special" person they like to allude to in the midst of their bluster.
Again, you never talked about anything you weren't interested in? You must be a real bore at parties.
Exactly. I've done the former, never done the latter.Having a conversation at a party about something you aren't interested in is different then going to a forum, finding a thread and posting numerous times (voluntarily) about something you 'have no interest in'.
Not to mention rehearsals, costumes, costume fittings, sets in the process of being built, etc. JLM was way into production when it got shelved.
Exactly. I've done the former, never done the latter.

He posted that clarification after my initial comment, whereafter he challenged my comment by saying he thought I would have done the same thing, which I rebutted. If he wants to see who's cast as Green Lantern, despite his indifference to the film, he's free to.Darth said he has no interest in seeing the movie. He is interested in who is getting what role and various other production info. Somehow I think he is in the right place to discuss and get info about who is being CASTED in what role seeing as this is the Green Lantern Casting thread
True, Warners has a lot of film properties beyond DC - which is why they aren't always in as much of a hurry to utilize those characters as most fans would like - but their DC properties are a very important part of their intellectual property that they can adapt into tentpole films.DC needs WB to start cranking out CBFs to stay viable in the film world...WB has been around a long time, they don't need CBFs
To me it's just to stay relevant in the eyes of the public and fanboys I think. If Pepsi started to make a bunch of movies, then obvious Coke should follow suit.
WB doesn't need comic book films, but hey, if they can make a profit out of it, then yes, I think friendly competition is in order.
I find it strange when people have nothing better to do with their time than hang out on message boards talking about films they have no interest in seeing.