TNC9852002
Banned User
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2002
- Messages
- 30,717
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 31
May 2010?
That seems too early..
-TNC
That seems too early..

-TNC
I didn't like it either especially considering
he could have just pulled the pin on the grenade, jumped the the safe hole, and accomplished the same thing that he did when he held the grenade and went all "suicide bomber" himself
I wish they had incorporated the whole plot point of him being a "boogeyman" to the infected people that was in the book. Still not a bad movie though.
What really confuses me about this movie is the fact that it cost 150million to make. Where did the budget go? Will Smith was probably paid 30 to 40million. What was the remaining 110million spent on because this film was not a CGI extravaganza?
[QUOTEFOR THE LAST TIME THEY ARE NOT VAMPIRES? what planet are you people on?]
extra toilet
FOR THE LAST TIME THEY ARE NOT VAMPIRES? what planet are you people on?
See the thing that bugged me about I AM LEGEND, they got Robert right for the most part.
But what bugged me is that Robert is not suppose to be a savior to the human race. In the end he realizes that he's the dinasour that's suppose to be extinct. He's a legend to the vampires, not to the humans. Thats what made the book ending so great.
The movie ending was just all hollywood.
But overall it was pretty well rounded movie. There are scenes that I like what they did. The scenes with the dog I found enjoyable. The dog was fleshed out more and I ended up liking it. I didn't like how Anna didn't turn out to turn out to be Ruth like I hoped. IMO I think, the head vamp was a loose translation of Ben Cortman. Just my IMO.
Francis Lawrence has some serious talent. What he did with New York was amazing. The part where Robert goes after Sam in the dark room was really terrifying. But his fault comes with adaptation and he can't really finish a movie strong.
One last thing.
What the hell was up with the Batman/ Superman poster. I know there is not a movie coming out. Was it for a cartoon? Or was it an earlier poster from when the movie was supposedly happening?
can someone tell me why the hell they had to use 3rd rate computer animation on the creatures when people in makeup would have looked so much better.
The ****ty CG really ruined the movie for me.
Perhaps the majority of the FX budget was spent on the deserted New York visuals, because that was very well done.
It was awesome.who here loved the "Batman vs. Superman" billboard at the beginning of the movie?