Superman Returns Official Rate and Review Superman Returns thread!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter J.Howlett
  • Start date Start date

How good was Superman Returns?

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1


Results are only viewable after voting.
what do you expect from some ultra conservative fox reporter

christ like?? sick of hearing that, all thee ultra right wingers automaticaly assume that becuase a film potrays a man more powerful then normal people, that they potraying a christ figure, no, Superman is not, he has his faults, he makes mistakes, and he gets misguided at times, he does not represent christ, and what does Singer being gay have anything to do with the film, X-Men at homosexual references in it, this film does not.........

Fox, lol, all they are good for is waxing Bush's ass......... that's it

plus Fox, *cough*, X-men *cough*
 
no offenise Explode, this IS the 'review' thread where the topic IS other people's opinions, good or bad. I'm not trying to be smart ARse or anything. :)
 
Angel Of Dark said:
what do you expect from some ultra conservative fox reporter

christ like?? sick of hearing that, all thee ultra right wingers automaticaly assume that becuase a film potrays a man more powerful then normal people, that they potraying a christ figure, no, Superman is not, he has his faults, he makes mistakes, and he gets misguided at times, he does not represent christ, and what does Singer being gay have anything to do with the film, X-Men at homosexual references in it, this film does not.........

Fox, lol, all they are good for is waxing Bush's ass......... that's it

plus Fox, *cough*, X-men *cough*

And waxing Bush's ass isnot a sight I want to see.
 
Angel Of Dark said:
what do you expect from some ultra conservative fox reporter

christ like?? sick of hearing that, all thee ultra right wingers automaticaly assume that becuase a film potrays a man more powerful then normal people, that they potraying a christ figure, no, Superman is not, he has his faults, he makes mistakes, and he gets misguided at times, he does not represent christ, and what does Singer being gay have anything to do with the film, X-Men at homosexual references in it, this film does not.........

Fox, lol, all they are good for is waxing Bush's ass......... that's it

plus Fox, *cough*, X-men *cough*
To be fair, StM had a lot of parellels to Christ. There is precedence if Singer chooses to follow that same path. It's about as Christ-like as Neo in The Matrix was.
 
Octoberist said:
no offenise Explode, this IS the 'review' thread where the topic IS other people's opinions, good or bad. I'm not trying to be smart ARse or anything. :)

Yeah but the thing is non smart ass dude is that some of you on this thread here dis other peoples opinions although you say you dont take them seriously:) :up:
 
It's weird that Superman is being compared to Christ: Aren't the creators Jewish?
 
explode7 said:
Yeah but the thing is non smart ass dude is that some of you on this thread here dis other peoples opinions although you say you dont take them seriously:) :up:

Herer's my response, Potato head!: :supes:
 
do you honestly think FOX, the makers of X-Men, the sames series Singer opted out of to make Superman, is going to give it a stellar review, they honestly probably did like it, but Fox Heads, are probably like, "make the review not so good, **** Singer, we need X3 to make more money then SR"
 
ok so how many real negative reviews now? 2?
 
i have a question for those who have seen the movie. besides superman coming back to "save" humanity are there really direct christ references like some of the reviews say? i guess i'm one of the few that doesn't see superman as a christ figure. everyone thinks that line from jor-el (" they can be a great people kal-el, they only lack the light to show them the way...for this reason above all, THEIR CAPACITY FOR GOOD, i have sent them you...") means he's christ like, sent by his father(god) to save mankind. to me that says jor-el sent his son to earth because he knew that someone would find him and take care of him out of the goodness of their hearts. to each his/her own i suppose.
 
The Associated Press has given SR (and this is the type os story that will get printed and publish in almost every newspaper in the country)

3.5 stars of 4

At the Movies: `Superman Returns'

CHRISTY LEMIRE

AP Movie Critic

Finally this summer, the hype is justified.
"Superman Returns" is everything you'd want it to be. It's reverential of the source material, yet a unique film all its own. It's steeped in decadent art-deco mood and details, yet completely current. It's joyous with the possibility of discovery, yet deeply moving in its melancholy. It should satisfy purists and attract new converts.

But most importantly for a summer blockbuster, it's just outright thrilling.
With technology having vastly improved since the original "Superman" from 1978, director Bryan Singer has constructed a visual marvel. The enormous set pieces are jaw-droppingly elaborate, especially a visceral near-plane crash toward the film's start that will leave you on the verge of simultaneous laughter and tears. (At a recent screening, it prompted many in the packed theater to burst into applause, and justifiably so.)
Having infused the first two "X-Men" movies with equal amount of dazzle and heart, Singer shows he's the ideal choice to take over the beloved franchise. He definitely has his own vision, but he was smart enough to retain key elements from the original film, including John Williams' score - the first few notes of which will surely inspire a wistful sense of childhood nostalgia - and archive footage of Marlon Brando as Superman's father, Jor-El.

And yet, there's something softer, sweeter, warmer about this "Superman" than its predecessors, both in its tone and its performances.
With his jet-black hair, blue eyes, chiseled facial features and muscular bod, Brandon Routh bears a great resemblance to the late Christopher Reeve - and is just as lovably klutzy in bespectacled Clark Kent mode - but he portrays the DC Comics superhero with more introspection and vulnerability, and not as much slam-bang charisma.

As Lex Luthor, Kevin Spacey does his best work since "American Beauty" and reminds us that, after starring in a string of maudlin flops, he still knows how to deliver a complex, subtle performance. He doesn't chew the scenery as Gene Hackman did in portraying the self-professed criminal mastermind, but he's smolderingly smarmy in a way that's just as amusing.
Kate Bosworth, meanwhile - who happened to play Sandra Dee opposite Spacey's Bobby Darin in the soggy biopic "Beyond the Sea" - gives us a surprisingly toned-down Lois Lane. It's a bit jarring at first until you stop and realize that the hard-driving, chain-smoking girl reporter is a woman now; the mother to a young son with her longtime fiance (James Marsden), Lois has matured and found that her priorities have somewhat shifted.

She doesn't need Superman to save her. She even wrote an editorial, "Why the World Doesn't Need Superman," to prove it - and earned a Pulitzer Prize in the process.
Things have changed in "Superman Returns." And things have stayed the same.

Sort of a sequel to 1980's "Superman II," this new film takes a little while to get going, but begins with the Man of Steel returning to Metropolis after a five-year absence. He'd gone searching for the remnants of his destroyed home planet, Krypton, and comes back to Earth finding that he still hasn't found what he's looking for.
But he knows to begin life again as Clark Kent at The Daily Planet (where Frank Langella has taken over as a comparatively authoritative Editor Perry White) and he responds just as instinctively to the first signs of trouble.

At the same time, Lex Luthor is back, too. He's gotten out of prison on a technicality and has an expanded posse of sycophants, including the always hilarious Parker Posey as his floozy Girl Friday in an eye-popping array of '40s-style ensembles. Here, as in the original "Superman," Lex has his eye on land, but instead of taking over California, he wants his own continent.

As always, Superman must stop him while simultaneously rescuing Lois, both literally and emotionally. Yes, "Superman Returns" is rooted firmly in the action-packed comic book world, which should keep the fanboys happy. But fundamentally, it's also a romance - a story of unattainable, impossible love that aches with longing and sadness.

There is, of course, the theory that Superman functions as a Christ figure - that Jor-El sent his only son to Earth to light the way for humanity. And you could argue that now, more than ever, we need a superhero to swoop down and fight for truth, justice and the American way.
You could even view the timing as significant in "Superman Returns": that the Man of Steel was gone for five years, the same period that's passed since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. (And it is a bit conspicuous that the Trade Center towers, which figured so prominently in those romantic late-night flights of the previous films, are absent now.)
All those elements are in there - if you choose to see them, if you need to find them.

So does the world really need Superman? Maybe not everyone. But people who love movies do.
"Superman Returns," a Warner Bros. Pictures release, is rated PG-13 for some intense action violence. Running time: 157 minutes. Three and a half stars out of four.
---
Motion Picture Association of America rating definitions:
G - General audiences. All ages admitted.
PG - Parental guidance suggested. Some material may not be suitable for children.
PG-13 - Special parental guidance strongly suggested for children under 13. Some material may be inappropriate for young children.
R - Restricted. Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian.
NC-17 - No one under 17 admitted.

http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/entertainment/14888695.htm
 
skruloos said:
To be fair, StM had a lot of parellels to Christ. There is precedence if Singer chooses to follow that same path. It's about as Christ-like as Neo in The Matrix was.

To be fair, the comics had parllels to Christ long before Donner came along. And there were parellels to Christ long before Superman was ever created (and they would claim Superman is the story of Moses... not Christ. That's where their religion fits in.) So, my point is this: enough about the Christ - Superman comparisons.
 
VGPOP said:
The Associated Press has given SR (and this is the type os story that will get printed and publish in almost every newspaper in the country)

3.5 stars of 4

At the Movies: `Superman Returns'

CHRISTY LEMIRE

AP Movie Critic

Finally this summer, the hype is justified.
"Superman Returns" is everything you'd want it to be. It's reverential of the source material, yet a unique film all its own. It's steeped in decadent art-deco mood and details, yet completely current. It's joyous with the possibility of discovery, yet deeply moving in its melancholy. It should satisfy purists and attract new converts.

But most importantly for a summer blockbuster, it's just outright thrilling.
With technology having vastly improved since the original "Superman" from 1978, director Bryan Singer has constructed a visual marvel. The enormous set pieces are jaw-droppingly elaborate, especially a visceral near-plane crash toward the film's start that will leave you on the verge of simultaneous laughter and tears. (At a recent screening, it prompted many in the packed theater to burst into applause, and justifiably so.)
Having infused the first two "X-Men" movies with equal amount of dazzle and heart, Singer shows he's the ideal choice to take over the beloved franchise. He definitely has his own vision, but he was smart enough to retain key elements from the original film, including John Williams' score - the first few notes of which will surely inspire a wistful sense of childhood nostalgia - and archive footage of Marlon Brando as Superman's father, Jor-El.

And yet, there's something softer, sweeter, warmer about this "Superman" than its predecessors, both in its tone and its performances.
With his jet-black hair, blue eyes, chiseled facial features and muscular bod, Brandon Routh bears a great resemblance to the late Christopher Reeve - and is just as lovably klutzy in bespectacled Clark Kent mode - but he portrays the DC Comics superhero with more introspection and vulnerability, and not as much slam-bang charisma.

As Lex Luthor, Kevin Spacey does his best work since "American Beauty" and reminds us that, after starring in a string of maudlin flops, he still knows how to deliver a complex, subtle performance. He doesn't chew the scenery as Gene Hackman did in portraying the self-professed criminal mastermind, but he's smolderingly smarmy in a way that's just as amusing.
Kate Bosworth, meanwhile - who happened to play Sandra Dee opposite Spacey's Bobby Darin in the soggy biopic "Beyond the Sea" - gives us a surprisingly toned-down Lois Lane. It's a bit jarring at first until you stop and realize that the hard-driving, chain-smoking girl reporter is a woman now; the mother to a young son with her longtime fiance (James Marsden), Lois has matured and found that her priorities have somewhat shifted.

She doesn't need Superman to save her. She even wrote an editorial, "Why the World Doesn't Need Superman," to prove it - and earned a Pulitzer Prize in the process.
Things have changed in "Superman Returns." And things have stayed the same.

Sort of a sequel to 1980's "Superman II," this new film takes a little while to get going, but begins with the Man of Steel returning to Metropolis after a five-year absence. He'd gone searching for the remnants of his destroyed home planet, Krypton, and comes back to Earth finding that he still hasn't found what he's looking for.
But he knows to begin life again as Clark Kent at The Daily Planet (where Frank Langella has taken over as a comparatively authoritative Editor Perry White) and he responds just as instinctively to the first signs of trouble.

At the same time, Lex Luthor is back, too. He's gotten out of prison on a technicality and has an expanded posse of sycophants, including the always hilarious Parker Posey as his floozy Girl Friday in an eye-popping array of '40s-style ensembles. Here, as in the original "Superman," Lex has his eye on land, but instead of taking over California, he wants his own continent.

As always, Superman must stop him while simultaneously rescuing Lois, both literally and emotionally. Yes, "Superman Returns" is rooted firmly in the action-packed comic book world, which should keep the fanboys happy. But fundamentally, it's also a romance - a story of unattainable, impossible love that aches with longing and sadness.

There is, of course, the theory that Superman functions as a Christ figure - that Jor-El sent his only son to Earth to light the way for humanity. And you could argue that now, more than ever, we need a superhero to swoop down and fight for truth, justice and the American way.
You could even view the timing as significant in "Superman Returns": that the Man of Steel was gone for five years, the same period that's passed since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. (And it is a bit conspicuous that the Trade Center towers, which figured so prominently in those romantic late-night flights of the previous films, are absent now.)
All those elements are in there - if you choose to see them, if you need to find them.

So does the world really need Superman? Maybe not everyone. But people who love movies do.
"Superman Returns," a Warner Bros. Pictures release, is rated PG-13 for some intense action violence. Running time: 157 minutes. Three and a half stars out of four.
---
Motion Picture Association of America rating definitions:
G - General audiences. All ages admitted.
PG - Parental guidance suggested. Some material may not be suitable for children.
PG-13 - Special parental guidance strongly suggested for children under 13. Some material may be inappropriate for young children.
R - Restricted. Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian.
NC-17 - No one under 17 admitted.

[URL="http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/entertainment/14888695.htm"]http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/entertainment/14888695.htm[/URL]

awesome, but not to rain on your parade, this is the same guy who gave "8 legged freaks" 3 stars......... hope that .5 stars is a big difference
 
So did Ebert.

I personally agree with the review of Eight Legged Freaks. It was a good, fun, comical movie. It harkened back to the B rated horror movies, but it recognized that those films were more comical than they were horror. The movie stayed to that B rated formula, upped the humor and so on.

So on the terms of what a movie sets out to achieve- which is how Ebert states he reviews movies- and whether the movie achieved it or not. Eight Legged freaks did achieve what it set out to do. Make a fun, 'spoof-like' B rated movie.
 
what did ebert think of superman? i know roeper sounded like he didn't really like it but said the fans will be pleased.
 
Angel Of Dark said:
awesome, but not to rain on your parade, this is the same guy who gave "8 legged freaks" 3 stars......... hope that .5 stars is a big difference
Any critic will have bashed a movie you love or praised one you hate. It´s the way it goes with opinions. It´s pretty much impossible to always agree with anyone.
 
Angel Of Dark said:
awesome, but not to rain on your parade, this is the same guy who gave "8 legged freaks" 3 stars......... hope that .5 stars is a big difference

You think general public thinks like this?

I go by what they have to say about the movie, not their previous work.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"