I saw Iron Man 3 at 810pm ET on Monday night 05/06/2013...
IM3 is definitely better than IM2.
1, 3, 2 is how I would rank them, which is interesting for a trilogy since it's good for a trilogy to end on a high note. However, what other trilogies can say they have a great beginning and end but a mediocre middle? Is this the first? Star Wars (Empire Strikes Back), TDK trilogy (The Dark Knight), Matrix (Matrix Reloaded), Godfather (Godfather Part II)... I can't think of a trilogy where the middle film is expressed as the worst in the trilogy... the trilogies I just mentioned would not be said to have poor middle films...
I loved everything about the movie. It was fun, exciting, very funny. I loved the tone, characters, dialogue. So here's what I didn't like:
SPOILERS!!!
1. Adrian Killian breathing fire... that was **uncalled for**. And even though it was followed up by a funny joke by Rhodey, it was still just lame.
2. The only "amazing feat" Iron Man does that took me out of the film and made me think "oh give me a break" is when Tony summons his armor at the end (when he is being held captive by the two goofy goons)... and the armor flies from Tennessee to Miami, Florida in about 30 seconds. LOL. Are you kidding me???? Yeah, his armor must fly at light speed!!!! Tony does a lot of amazing things with his technology but I found that ridiculous.
3. While I thought the score for IM3 was the best in the trilogy, I was disappointed by the lack of AC/DC. The scores for IM have never been particularly strong, so I always felt AC/DC was Iron Man's official theme music. The Avengers movie made this clear when Iron Man shows up in action for the first time against Loki and they play AC/DC music again... but alas, no AC/DC in Iron Man 3. Oh well...
Most of all...
4. The villains. Anybody else tired of "super soldiers"??? Marvel needs to stop relying on this for their films. What exactly were Killian's long-term goals? I never felt it was clear at all what he wanted to do... like-wise, the use of super soldiers/enhanced human beings is being used too much.
I can totally understand why comicfans would be annoyed by what they did to the Mandarian (Ben Kingsley)... he really didn't have much of a role... he was in a few "home video" movies broadcasted on the news and then Tony meets up with him and finds out the truth... I have never been an Iron Man comic reader, so what they did with the character didn't bother me; what bothered me was the twist made a lot of the tension in the film disappear because the "big bad villain" was revealed to be a dud, and all Tony is left to fight is a bunch of generic super soldiers...
Overall, the Iron Man trilogy is a very very good trilogy. I would go so far to say it equals the Dark Knight trilogy (where I would rank the films as 2, 1, 3 in order of greatness)... but one thing I would definitely say the TDK trilogy tops the IM trilogy with is the area of villains. I don't think the IM trilogy ever had a memorable villain. They missed out with the Mandarian.
Also, can anybody clear this up for me?
Plot hole.
The Mandarian (Trevor) thinks he's just acting a role and doesn't realize he hurt any people... so did he shoot the political figure or not??? I'm talking about the guy he held a gun to and demanded the President call him in order to save his life... but then he shot him any ways.
Trevor said he didn't hurt anybody and didn't realize what was going on...
so did he kill that Senator guy or what?