no way the spiderman cast is tired and i think if they continue the film theres a good chance they wil do it without the egos. tobey maguire isnt asmartmouth like spiderman should be. they briefly tried him out as being whitty in the first film when he fought bonesaw and he failed horribly. and i dont really feel chemistry between tobey a kirsten. maybe its just me.Why did you make your font bigger?
Topher Grace is a good actor, but Tobey was the right man for the job. Topher did a good job as Venom and hopefully will be able to reprise his role for future films. However, I highly doubt that.
I don't like Kirsten as Mary Jane either, but in the third she did a much better job than the previous two. If they were to change her character now, it just wouldn't feel right. Love it ro hate it, they should keep the cast intact if they can.
Edit: Ugh, you edited. Elish Cuthbert as Mary Jane? Uhh...
Wow, again with the big font. Overcomensating much?no way the spiderman cast is tired and i think if they continue the film theres a good chance they wil do it without the egos. tobey maguire isnt asmartmouth like spiderman should be. they briefly tried him out as being whitty in the first film when he fought bonesaw and he failed horribly. and i dont really feel chemistry between tobey a kirsten. maybe its just me.
I can actually see this gut as Peter. Can he act?My recommendation for Parker...
![]()
Scott Mechlowicz.
http://www.apple.com/trailers/universal/peacefulwarrior/large.html
Def. has the Peter Parker look...And some acrobatic skills as well.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Not really.I can actually see this gut as Peter. Can he act?
My recommendation for Parker...
![]()
Scott Mechlowicz.
http://www.apple.com/trailers/universal/peacefulwarrior/large.html
Def. has the Peter Parker look...And some acrobatic skills as well.
Blam the writers not Tobey.tobey maguire isnt asmartmouth like spiderman should be. they briefly tried him out as being whitty in the first film when he fought bonesaw and he failed horribly.
Not really.
But Maguire don't have the timing to pull out some jokes.Blam the writers not Tobey.
Like I said, "Not really".sure he can! check out this clip...it demonstrates his ability for drama, comedy, and action all in one scene! hehe
http://youtube.com/watch?v=4aMD4uy-QGc
Wow, again with the big font. Overcomensating much?
Their egos? Just because they're famous and make a lot of money doesn't mean they have egos. You're just feeding into a celebrity cliche. What grounds do you have for stating that?
Tobey hasn't really had the chance and you can't blame him for the dialogue they give him.
Yet they're good friends. Hmm.
But Maguire don't have the timing to pull out some jokes.
He just read the lines. Put Seinfeld to write jokes for him, and he still won't be a funny Spider-Man.
Thats why every scene that Topher appears, I thught: Damn, he's a good Eddie Brock, but he could be as awesome Peter Parker.
Topher has a good timing for comedy, Tobey don't. Just see the difference.
i gotta agree that Tobey didn't come off like the wisecracker that Pete is. blame the writers all you want but even when Tobey was delivering sarcastic and smartass comments he didn't do it convincingly imo.
Jerry Seinfeld isn't funny though.But Maguire don't have the timing to pull out some jokes.
He just read the lines. Put Seinfeld to write jokes for him, and he still won't be a funny Spider-Man.
Thats why every scene that Topher appears, I thught: Damn, he's a good Eddie Brock, but he could be as awesome Peter Parker.
Topher has a good timing for comedy, Tobey don't. Just see the difference.
Making movies is their job. Wouldn't you want more money for your job if you could get it? Just because he makes a lot of money doesn't mean he hasd a huge ego, you're just making assumptions which are probably based on jealously, because you don't make that type of money or have the luxury of demanding more money from your current employer and getting it.well my punchy friend, do you think that with every movie that they do they do not want MUCH fatter paychecks? Tobey Maguire made 16 million on Spiderman 3 which really is not even all that much compared to tom cruise who cleared 100 million on war of the worlds. Do you think that an actor increasing the amount of money they are willing work for movie after movie is not due to ego? A speculated 20 million for Tobey Maguire is way too much for the caliber actor he is. basically cliches are cliches for a reason. they are not just randomly assigned falsities. And did you even see the first film at all? they tried to give him whitty dialogue (in has match with bonesaw) and he sucked it up. thats why our current Spiderman is not funny. Writers create dialogue that the actors can run with and when it comes to quips, Maguire might as well be a one legged man in the 100 meter dash. Do not get this wrong i do not mean to bash Tobey Maguire its just that in spite of what you think hes not an amazing actor; hes a halfway decent actor
and about me "Overcomensating", i apologise
Physically, Scott would be better than Adam but acting wise, Adam would be better than Scott. And no, although Topher Grace is funny, I don't think he'd make a better Peter than Tobey. I think Topher did a good job as Venom.topher really would have been a great parker, but Scott Mechlowicz really is not a bad choice. but what about adam brody?
Like I said, "Not really".
I like Eurotrip and think it's hilarious but that doesn't mean he's a good actor.wow, quite a sense of humor ya got there!
Physically, Scott would be better than Adam but acting wise, Adam would be better than Scott. And no, although Topher Grace is funny, I don't think he'd make a better Peter than Tobey. I think Topher did a good job as Venom.