notoriousnate87
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2006
- Messages
- 1,247
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Topher Grace signed a contract to be in two Spider-Man films.
In your opinion, would Peter Jackson be interested in directing Spidey 4?
Topher Grace signed a contract to be in two Spider-Man films.
If you're trying to rationalize Spider-Man, you've already failed.
Need I play the "radioactive spider?" card?
No Robert Rodriguez. RR does nothing but fill his films with useless action and have character development and writing come last. Not to mention his sfx studio sucks.
I DARE anyone to disagree!
Actors normally sign on for multiple movies...doesn't mean that they'll actually be in the sequels.
No Robert Rodriguez. RR does nothing but fill his films with useless action and have character development and writing come last. Not to mention his sfx studio sucks.
I DARE anyone to disagree!
Venom's purpose was served in this movie. I already knew coming in that this was his one and only shot, and I was glad with the performance of it.Are you seriously telling me you would not prefer to see Topher Grace as Eddie Brock in the sequel to Spider-Man 3. Jesus! Wow! Take a look at your screen name! It seems very confusing in relation to the statement you made dude.
I'd rather have a good actor play Peter than an average actor.of course not...i'm not saying he's a great actor or anything. that's the only movie i've seen him in, but if the trailer for Peaceful Warrior is any indication of how he acted in that movie then it looks like he might have some potential...
Not what I meant, but okay.Give Adam Brody the same work out regiment that was given to Tobey and Topher and he can be Peter. Those two guys were skinny before they got their roles and now look at them. Brody's Definitely got a geeky side and a humorous side.
Maybe, but I think it's a little awkward to have someone say a bunch of one liners while trying to have an intense fight scene. It may have been okay for the comics, but I don't know how well it would work for the movies.I put Seinfeld cause he was the first comediant that I remember at the time. Choose any other funny guy you want writting the jokes for Maguire, and he still will not be "Spider-Man funny".![]()
In years to come, way down the line people want to do this, then that's fine but I think it's too soon to change things up like that. It'd be confusing and annoying. I don't want this to be like the Bond films.Guess not... NEXT.t:
Just kiddin'
I think its time to Raimi step down and let other people show their vision of these characters.
The third movie just prove that. And if Raimi leave, the cast will too.
So lets dream( and hope) for good cast and crew.
Thats the whole point of this thread.
well...i, personally, don't need to see an actor that can play every role under the sun...i just want an actor that can play the Pete that i read from the comics...I'd rather have a good actor play Peter than an average actor.
And you could play it better? He plays Peter Parker pretty damn well and even others in the industry say he's fantastic.Who gives a crap if hes playing an iconic character?? He does not play the character very well. I believe the entire point I was making was that actors continually ask for more money (you agreed). And your saying thats not ego driven? Use common sense; the idea of saying "Ill only do this movie for this amount of dollars because I am worth it." if thats not ego then i do not know what is. You call it a "cliche" but its the truth, my friend. and yes I have seen a number of his movies as well as parts he has done on television; still not a 20 million dollar actor.
oh but wait I am just feeding cliches. bravo.
I wouldn't watch a Peter Jackson Spider-man movie.In your opinion, would Peter Jackson be interested in directing Spidey 4?
Yeah, but if they signed him they have to pay him for it so why would they waste that kind of money if they didn't have it? From what I hear, one of the characters that supposedly dies doesn't actually die and that's probably Eddie Brock, so I can maybe see Venom back for the fourth with a bit of the Lizard (although I don't think that would be right) and I think Venom would kill Gwen Stacy.Actors normally sign on for multiple movies...doesn't mean that they'll actually be in the sequels.
Fincher would cost WAY too much (probably) and Cuaron would **** it up.Joseph Gordon-Levitt is perfect for Spidey
Mary Elizabeth Winstead is perfect for MJ.
Maggie Smith is perfect for Aunt May.
Bring in David Fincher or Alfonso Cuaron as director and make comic book movie history..
I'd rather have an actor who can handle the diversity of Peter, but that's just me.well...i, personally, don't need to see an actor that can play every role under the sun...i just want an actor that can play the Pete that i read from the comics...![]()
Fincher would cost WAY too much (probably) and Cuaron would **** it up.
Um, no they didn't? $258 million plus $1 million doesn't equal $400 million? But anyway, my point is they already spend A LOT of money so if they had a David Fincher as director, they'd have to spend A LOT more and I don't think they'd be able to afford it.Um, they spent over 400 million on SM3. I think they can afford David Fincher.![]()
and do you even know who Alfonso Cuaron is?![]()
The man could make an awesome Spider-man movie with his eyes closed.
Yet he ****ed up Children of Men and Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban.